My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2018 01 22
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2018 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2018 01 22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:20 PM
Creation date
1/30/2018 10:00:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2018 01 22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 20, 2017 <br />Page 6 of 6 <br />Ritchie stated that there was no more information at this time and that the grant application was <br />due in January. If any of the commissioners wanted to attend either conference they could <br />reach out to staff. <br />Fahey stated that the Saving Places early registration is open now and that she was working <br />with Rob Zuccaro. <br />Dickinson gave an update on the structure at 721 Grant Avenue, which is ready to be lifted and <br />moved. He encouraged the commissioners to check it out over the next two weeks. <br />Chuck Thomas stated that while the 721 Grant Avenue project had been expensive, it spoke to <br />the earlier issue of being able to work around a lack of basements. <br />Dickinson added that they had found artifacts under the structure that they were donating to the <br />museum. <br />Haley stated that 2F passed and thanked Koertje and Chuck Thomas for their efforts. <br />Cyndi Thomas stated that Johnson brought up points that the Commission needed to address. <br />She asked her fellow commissioners to look up the word "significance" and consider its <br />meaning, but that she did not know the answer herself. Everyone has a different point of view, <br />which can be a benefit, but as there was uncertainty among the commissioners there was more <br />they could do to educate themselves. <br />Ritchie added that staff discussed these questions, as well. <br />Dickinson stated that having a plaque on every house would make the distinction meaningless. <br />He asked if it was enough that something was built and maintained its appearance. He added <br />that there needed to be a good reason for issuing a stay, as stays do matter to owners and <br />applicants. <br />Chuck Thomas responded that the Commission was not preserving the structure. His point in <br />discussion in the public hearing today was that the house was built in a neighborhood with a <br />number of postwar houses. <br />Haley stated that each generation had new definitions of significance. A previous generation <br />would not have wanted to preserve structures from the 1930s and 1940s. <br />Ritchie asked if the Commission wanted this discussion item on a future agenda. <br />Haley asked if staff could wait for Lauren Trice to return to add the item to the agenda. <br />Koertje stated that "period of significance" was a phrase used a lot, but it was not part of the <br />Louisville code in any context. Louisville does not have a period of significance that the <br />Commission is required to consider. <br />DISCUSSION ITEMS FOR FUTURE MEETINGS <br />Adjourn: <br />Fahey moved to adjourn, Koertje seconded. The meeting was adjourned at 7:27 PM. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.