My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Library Board of Trustees Minutes 2008 10 16
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
>
2006-2019 Library Board of Trustees Agendas and Packets
>
2008 Library Board of Trustees Agendas and Packets
>
Library Board of Trustees Minutes 2008 10 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:23:38 PM
Creation date
12/4/2008 10:47:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
LBTMIN 2008 10 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Library Board of Trustees <br />Minutes <br />OCTOBER 16, 2008 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />the time of the meeting, a formal proposal had not yet been received but was <br />anticipated on Friday, October 17, 2008. <br /> <br />Based on summaries from the local newspapers, the Trustees centered their discussion <br />on the results from the Town of Superior's October 14, 2008 Town Hall Meeting. The <br />Town of Superior while rejecting the City of Louisville's financial proposal countered <br />with the following two proposals: <br /> <br />PROPOSAL #1 <br /> <br />The Town of Superior will in 2009 pay the City of Louisville half of the City's proposed <br />$125,000 payment for 2009 services, and directs the City of Louisville to collect <br />approximately $30 in user fees from residents who choose to patronize the Louisville <br />Public Library. The Town of Superior estimates that 2,000 residents will participate. <br />Presumably this arrangement would continue for the following two years as both <br />municipalities worked toward a longer term agreement for library services. <br /> <br />PROPOSAL #2 <br /> <br />The Town of Superior will pay the City of Louisville $115,000 in 2009, $125,000 in 2010 <br />and $135,000 in 2011, and promise to move forward aggressively with the City of <br />Louisville in exploring the concept of a library district for the two municipalities. <br /> <br />The Library Board of Trustees discussion of these two proposals is summarized below: <br /> <br />PROPOSAL #1 <br /> <br />Pro: <br />The City of Louisville is to receive payment of 50% of a discounted rate proposed to the <br />Town of Superior in the City's latest offer letter. If Superior agreed to a three-year <br />contract with the City of Louisville for library services, the City could anticipate an <br />incremental increase of that amount (again, 50% of an already discounted rate) for the <br />following two years. <br /> <br />Con: <br />The City of Louisville has already offered the Town of Superior a discounted fee for <br />library services, far below the true cost of providing service to Superior patrons. At some <br />level of payment-a level that the Board of Trustees felt has been met-a proposed <br />payment is so small that the offer does not constitute an offer of operating in good faith <br />and is unrelated to the true cost of providing service. <br /> <br />Additionally, the Town of Superior's conclusion that 2,000 residents would pay the City <br />of Louisville a user fee for access to library services disregards the close to 95% decline <br />in patron activity in a local library issuing fees for library service as experienced by the <br />City of Lafayette three years ago. Also, the onus for collecting these fees falls to the <br />City of Louisville as proposed by the Town of Superior-a responsibility that raises <br />troubling questions of legality for our municipality, as well as additional internal costs <br />related to the collection and accounting for these funds. The risks for our City-both <br />financially and ethically-in accepting such a proposal are great, particularly since there <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.