Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 20, 2018 <br />Page 10 of 16 <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated there is strong public support for this and the <br />literature shows the signs can create unnecessary animosity. She sees no reason to <br />include this restriction, it doesn't add value. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann made a substitute motion to approve Ordinance No. 1756, <br />Series 2018 as written, Keany seconded the motion <br />Roll call vote on the substitute motion. Motion passed 4-3; no votes from <br />Councilmember Loo, Mayor Pro Tem Lipton, Mayor Muckle. (the original motion dies) <br />RESOLUTION NO. 13, SERIES 2018 — A RESOLUTION SETTING CERTAIN, <br />WATER, WASTEWATER, STORMWATER AND OTHER FEES, RATES, AND <br />CHARGES FOR THE CITY OF LOUISVILLE, COLORADO <br />Mayor Muckle introduced the item. <br />Director Kowar stated staff recommends increasing utility rates for the 2018 calendar <br />year in the amount of 3% for water, 7% for wastewater and 7% for stormwater to <br />address smoothing of rates and debt increases All are in accordance with financial <br />policies and debt coverage requirements as part of loan packages. <br />Councilmember Maloney asked about the debt service coverage calculation. He asked <br />if is it our policy or the lenders policy that these be by functional area or can it be an <br />aggregate Finance Director Watson stated it can be combined; the bonds are issued as <br />a combined utility. However, we try to get each utility to function on its own. This is set <br />by the bond holders Director Watson stated at one point we consolidated all enterprise <br />funds into one large fund to increase coverage factors <br />Councilmember Maloney stated if one ratio is used across all the enterprises it is more <br />efficient Director Kowar stated the funds are separated so each utility charges <br />appropriately for that enterprise fund At some point each utility has to take control of its <br />own debt coverage requirements. <br />Councilmember Maloney noted there would be ups and downs in each category over <br />the life of the bond. That then affects the fee calculation from year to year. Kowar noted <br />the covenant requirements get as specific as saying your debt coverage ratios have to <br />be met on a monthly income basis not an annual overall. Councilmember Maloney <br />suggested unless the calculation is combined there is a risk of the calculation being <br />higher than it needs to be. <br />Mayor Muckle stated it is intentional to do it this way so we can determine if each fund is <br />actually working appropriately and the fees are justified to maintain each utility. <br />