My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2018 02 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2018 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2018 02 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
3/6/2018 10:33:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2018 02 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 20, 2018 <br />Page 5 of 16 <br />Mayor Muckle moved to approve Resolution No.10, Series 2018; Councilmember Loo <br />seconded. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she is concerned about the price, it seems we are <br />paying for the new sign rather than buying the existing sign She doesn't agree with the <br />valuation and is troubled there is no plan for where it will end up. <br />Councilmember Maloney agreed with Councilmember Stolzmann He stated his <br />concern is the fair market value process doesn't make sense to him, and we are <br />acquiring something without any long-term plan for the item He doesn't want to <br />encumber future councils to pay for this <br />Mayor Muckle stated this is why we have the HPF. He noted the current conceptual <br />plan for the museum has a place for this. This is the preservation of our history. It would <br />be penny wise and pound foolish to not buy the sign. <br />Councilmember Maloney felt there is a need for a plan and process for the sign before <br />dollars are committed. <br />Councilmember Leh stated he doesn't have a problem using HPF dollars for this <br />purpose, but is troubled by the lack of a plan and the way the sign was valued. He <br />agreed the sign is important and worth buying, but wondered if this plan is ready. <br />Councilmember Keany supports the purchase realizing there is no current plan; and <br />feels this would be a lost opportunity if not approved. He would rather be assured we <br />have the sign with no plan than lose the opportunity to save the sign <br />Director Zuccaro stated staff knows there are unanswered questions and noted the <br />owner is under no obligation to keep the sign Staff expedited this as quickly as possible <br />knowing there is no solid plan. The timing really required it be brought forward now <br />Mayor Muckle stated the fear of future costs is not a reason to let this historic artifact be <br />lost. <br />Roll call vote: Motion passed 4-3; no votes from Councilmember Maloney, <br />Councilmember Stolzmann, Mayor Pro Tem Lipton <br />Mayor Muckle moved to approve Resolution No. 11, Series 2018; Councilmember Loo <br />seconded. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she doesn't support this as she feels it does not meet <br />the review criteria specifically the size, height, location, design and appearance. She <br />feels the criteria must be met for her to support this. She noted the sign code needs re- <br />writing <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.