My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 04 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2018 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 04 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:28 PM
Creation date
4/23/2018 5:51:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2018 04 17
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
490
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 20, 2018 <br />Page 7 of 19 <br />David Sinkey, 712 Main Street, with Boulder Creek Neighborhoods thanked City staff for <br />help in answering questions and helping them study any conflicting policies. Boulder <br />Creek came to Louisville in 2010 to be a part of a community where they build homes. <br />The company takes pride in being a part of Louisville. He noted companies of the size <br />of theirs often are housed in a more corporate setting. Their current offices have <br />become too small. They now own 4 buildings in downtown. Boulder Creek has about <br />80 employees along with contract employees. 30-40 are currently housed in downtown <br />Louisville. He felt the company is an asset to downtown, but noted they have displaced <br />some retail space. Talking to his neighbors on Main Street he realized the need for <br />providing retail space. The design has gone through several iterations. The setback of <br />top floors loses square footage but provides a better feel. He appreciated the thoughtful <br />feedback they have gotten. <br />Erik Hartronft, 950 Spruce Street, project architect, stated this project has been in the <br />works for about 4 years. The economics of downtown are dependent on every single lot. <br />Retail is important and they tried to respect the surrounding buildings. Historic <br />structures should not be copied but complement the inventory of buildings. Downtown is <br />quite eclectic. He noted they had several design drivers to look at as they developed the <br />design. He stated providing parking on site is expensive. The parking has a gate and <br />lights telling if there are open spaces. The third level is set back 49' from the front of the <br />building, subordinate and not visible where the two story element is. The third floor is <br />setback on the alley side as well. The balcony on the second floor gives relief to what <br />would otherwise be just a two story facade. He showed the design board and described <br />the different siding elements for the building. There is space for a mural on the side of <br />the building. The stair tower and two balconies are the only waivers requested. <br />Director Zuccaro addressed the downtown parking calculation and staff's belief that a <br />parking structure doesn't count toward FAR in downtown. <br />Public Comments <br />Joel Hayes, 187 Harper, said the mass and scale are incompatible with this location in <br />historic downtown. The height dwarfs everything on the block. It changes the character <br />on the block and invites other buildings to change as well. Parking doesn't meet needs <br />and will be full. <br />Andy Johnson, 920 Lincoln, felt a flier he received on his door needed some correction <br />from his view as an architect. He commended the applicant, architect and staff for <br />putting together a difficult project. Parking calculations are met. The basement as an <br />area should not be considered as habitable space. He said the flier didn't correctly <br />portray the look. <br />Charles Haseman, 247 S. Lark Avenue, showed slides and voiced his objection to <br />combining the two lots; two buildings would be better. There is not enough space to <br />view artwork in the alley. He felt the third floor towered above and showed images to <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.