My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 04 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2018 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 04 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:28 PM
Creation date
4/23/2018 5:51:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2018 04 17
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
490
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 20, 2018 <br />Page 10 of 19 <br />Debbie Davies, 603 W. Aspen Court, spoke to the math of the parking. Currently there <br />are about 15 spots behind the building so adding the proposed spaces would only be <br />net gain of about 15. She noted any new tenants in the other buildings owned by the <br />applicant would take up spaces as well. <br />Jean Morgan, 1131 Spruce Street, wanted the project to protect scale and mass. This is <br />too tall and third story will overwhelm the block and be precedent setting for more three <br />story buildings. She noted Louisville had received a historic preservation award and <br />asked Council to not approve this as presented but make this project be an appropriate <br />addition to downtown Louisville. <br />Council Questions <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if there is a way to make sure the first floor will always be <br />retail. <br />Director Zuccaro said there is no regulatory note to require the retail at this time but one <br />could be added if the applicant agreed. <br />Councilmembers discussed the process and whether this item should be continued to <br />another meeting. Councilmember Loo moved for Council to make a decision on this <br />project at this meeting. No second was heard. <br />Attorney Light cautioned Council on making a motion to wrap this up as it might cause <br />an obstacle if they choose to continue the resolution approval or disapproval to a later <br />date. He was asked if the items later on the agenda could be continued; he replied they <br />could, however, it should be done item by item not as one. <br />Mayor Muckle moved to continue this agenda item to the April 3 meeting; <br />Councilmember Keany seconded. Roll Call Vote: Motion failed (Yes = 2, No = 5; voting <br />no were Councilmember Maloney, Mayor Pro Tem Lipton, Councilmember Leh, <br />Councilmember Loo, Councilmember Stolzmann.) <br />Mayor Muckle called for Council comments. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann thought there was some agreement on this project namely; <br />first floor retail, some parking issues exist in downtown, and there is support for <br />redeveloping this piece of property. The themes she kept hearing that need addressed <br />are parking, the massing and the materials. She didn't feel the basement storage space <br />should be excluded from the parking calculation. She felt the patio space should be <br />included in the parking calculation. She said the design guidelines are part of City code. <br />She noted the northern part of the building and asked if there are ways to reduce <br />massing. She said it is in Council's purview to address the massing. Stepping down on <br />the second floor on the alley would help the pedestrian sense. The alley walkway could <br />37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.