My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 04 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2018 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 04 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:28 PM
Creation date
4/23/2018 5:51:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2018 04 17
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
490
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 20, 2018 <br />Page 14 of 19 <br />Mayor Muckle noted Council does not always have to follow the board recommendation. <br />He felt the community gets a better outcome because of Council's review. <br />Councilmember Maloney agreed Council should rely on staff and the appointed boards <br />and commissions. <br />Motion: Councilmember Maloney moved to approve Resolution No.17, Series 2018 <br />with a note to require retail or restaurant on the first floor. Councilmember Loo <br />seconded. <br />City Attorney Light suggested language for the note; prior to recordation of the PUD, the <br />PUD shall be amended to include a note to state "first floor uses shall be limited to retail <br />or restaurant use. Any first floor use other than retail or restaurant use requires City <br />Council approval of a PUD amendment" Councilmember Maloney noted that captured <br />his intent. <br />Mayor Muckle felt there were minor things that could be done that would make him <br />happier about the project so he would be voting against the motion. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton wanted thought put into softening the appearance. He felt <br />Council had the ability to suggest revision to the architecture. He asked if staff had <br />enough direction to work with the applicant. <br />Director Zucarro noted staff had taken a lot of notes but would be happy to have more <br />detail. Those noted ideas included consider some types of awning or other shapes or <br />forms in the architecture, work on scale and mass, lower floor plates, lighting on patios, <br />first floor retail note. <br />Substitute Motion: Mayor Pro Tem Lipton moved to continue this item to the next <br />meeting seconded by Councilmember Keany. <br />Councilmember Loo wanted more precise direction if Council was continuing this <br />matter. She did not have objections to the architecture as presented. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated he would like the following considered: he wanted to <br />soften the contemporary look, look at the top section of windows on first floor, top row of <br />windows on third floor so not so prominent, how does the material interact with other <br />elements (can't be seen well in this rendering) — a better depiction of the color selection <br />on the third floor. Balcony on south section would like to see more detail of what is <br />contemplated; nice feature if done well. Not a lot of opportunity for awnings but maybe <br />some architectural feature where awning might create more interesting design. <br />Mayor Muckle noted achieving symmetry on the north end of the building with the <br />upstairs windows. <br />41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.