My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 04 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2018 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 04 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:28 PM
Creation date
4/23/2018 5:51:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2018 04 17
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
490
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 3, 2018 <br />Page 6 of 8 <br />Mayor Muckle stated such information wouldn't dictate a comp plan amendment but if <br />we have good information that could inform that conversation. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton would like the study to tell us if anything in the comp plan or <br />zoning is preventing the area from redeveloping. We need to make this an opportunity <br />and everything should be on the table for consideration to position the corridor to be <br />successful looking forward. We need to get the information. He noted the owner can be <br />very patient in the sale regardless of what the City does. The zoning and entitlements <br />need to be consistent with the community but we need to move something forward. He <br />stated he doesn't want to spin our wheels for eight more years. The status quo is <br />unacceptable and we need to figure out what we can do to get something done. <br />Mayor Muckle proposed staff bring back a Request for Proposals for a study that <br />includes Councilmembers Maloney's principles and with language about current new <br />retail trends. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated there is energy around this. Many residents are <br />frustrated and we need to do something. We can affect how we encourage activities in <br />the city. The principles in the RFP should be 1) The primary purpose of the area is a <br />regional retail focus to support the operations of the City. 2) The goal should be long- <br />term financial viability of the area. If we meet those goals in the study, we should be <br />open to other uses in the area. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated the principles should be determined by Council. Council <br />should take the leadership and drive the principles and have further conversation. <br />Director DeJong stated staff will bring back a draft RFP to engage a consultant to give <br />us market information specific to that site that includes those principles for Council's <br />review and discussion. <br />City Manager Balser stated staff does want to be proactive and bring back realistic <br />opportunities for the property. <br />EXECUTIVE SESSION <br />REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS <br />(Louisville Charter, Section 5-2(c) — Authorized Topics — Consideration of real property <br />acquisitions and dispositions, only as to appraisals and other value estimates and <br />strategy, and C.R.S. 24-6-402(4)(a)) <br />Mayor Muckle stated the City Manager is Requesting the City Council Convene an <br />Executive Session for the Purpose of Consideration of Potential Real Property <br />Acquisitions Concerning Properties in the Vicinity of Louisville. City Attorney Light <br />introduced the request for executive session. <br />52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.