My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 05 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2018 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 05 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:28 PM
Creation date
5/11/2018 3:02:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2018 05 01
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
454
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 17, 2018 <br />Page 7 of 15 <br />5F Approval of Resolution No. 19, Series 2018 — A Resolution Accepting the <br />Conveyance of and Deeds for Transfer to the City of Tract B, Hutchinson Corner <br />Subdivision — moved from consent agenda <br />Director Zuccaro stated this is a request to accept deeds for a section of Hutchinson <br />Corner. This was originally approved in 2016 and included the dedication of this tract of <br />land and includes portions for right-of-way, sidewalks, and utilities and a small pocket <br />park dedicated to the Acme Mine. Staff has received signed deeds from the HOA and <br />developer and requests Council accept the deeds. One of the requirements of this <br />subdivision was to fill the mine shaft. That was completed in 2015-16 and accepted by <br />the engineering department. <br />Councilmember Loo asked if we are accepting property on both sides of the sidewalk. <br />Director Zuccaro stated yes, the sidewalk is detached from the street so the City would <br />have property on both sides of the sidewalk. <br />Councilmember Loo stated the landscape plan here is complex and the City may not be <br />able to maintain it to the level to which it should be kept. It will be an attractive nuisance <br />if we can't maintain it well enough. She stated the HOA should be responsible for <br />maintaining this, not the City. <br />Public comments — None. <br />Councilmember Keany asked what happens if the City does not accept these deeds as <br />it is a requirement of the Subdivision Agreement. Attorney Light stated acceptance does <br />not preclude further conversations with the HOA about taking over maintenance, but it <br />would close out the existing agreement. The City could look at alternatives such as a <br />licensing agreement or reallocating responsibilities to the HOA. City Attorney Light <br />stated that if the Council does not approve the acceptance we will have a contract for <br />which the City has not met its obligation. <br />Mayor Muckle noted accepting these deeds is doing what we said we would do in a <br />contract. The other details can be worked out later. Mayor Pro Tem Lipton agreed and <br />noted the landscaping plan could be changed. <br />Mayor Muckle moved approve Resolution No. 19; Mayor Pro Tem Lipton seconded. <br />Voice vote 5-1. Councilmember Loo voted no. <br />51 — Approval of Purchase of Recreation and Senior Center Expansion Fitness <br />Equipment — moved from consent agenda <br />Director Stevens stated this is the purchase of the fitness equipment for the Recreation <br />Center expansion. There have been questions about the process to get to this point. He <br />stated additional information was provided to Council for the meeting. He stated this <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.