My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2018 06 12
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Study Sessions
>
2018 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2018 06 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:57:44 AM
Creation date
6/15/2018 10:17:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2018 06 12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Study Session Summary <br />June 12, 2018 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />1. What type of feedback is City Council most interested in hearing from the <br />Planning Commission regarding the development review process? <br />2. What should be the highest priorities from a development or design perspective <br />for the Planning Commission in their review? <br />3. What perspectives of the City Council is the Planning Commission interested in <br />hearing to help guide decision making? <br />Members discussed the interviewing process for appointing members and how Council <br />would like to use that process to better understand applicants' motivation for serving. <br />Council noted they depend on the Planning Commission to do the technical work on the <br />applications before they come to Council. <br />Mayor Muckle noted it is important for the Commission to understand neighborhood <br />character and compatibility in their process. <br />Council members noted Council puts a lot of weight into the decisions on the Planning <br />Commission and they see the Planning Commission is making very informed decisions. <br />This helps frame the decisions for the Council. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she likes to know why members feel an application <br />meets or does not meet the criteria on applications. <br />Members discussed how they think they get better applications in the process by <br />allowing staff more ability to negotiate with applicants. <br />Members discussed the importance of interpreting the criteria, guidelines, and <br />standards in the planning documents. <br />Members discussed how public benefit is weighed in the process. <br />Planning Commission members asked how best to let Council know of policy and work <br />plan items they would like Council to address. <br />Members discussed how parking impacts various projects differently. <br />Members discussed how sustainability could or should be included in the land use <br />process. <br />Members discussed the upcoming Transportation Master Plan. <br />Adjourn 9:14 pm. <br />Submitted by — Meredyth Muth <br />June 14, 2018 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.