My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Building Code Board of Appeals Agenda and Packet 2013 05 16
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2000-2019 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
2013 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
Building Code Board of Appeals Agenda and Packet 2013 05 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:00:20 PM
Creation date
6/25/2018 10:45:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BCBOAPKT 2013 05 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Building Code Board of Appeals <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 21, 2013 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />have reviewed and adopted the codes. He discussed the process used by Ft. Collins <br />and stated he was impressed with how they had handled it. Their process started in <br />2007 with consultants. It also included public meetings and an adoption process. Ft. <br />Collins views the 1gCC as more of a maintenance code for the community instead of <br />life safety. Swanson also stated training and the education of all involved is a major <br />part of the discussion. Johnson added this is a good time to start to take small steps <br />toward discussing the codes and what everyone would like to see come out of <br />adopting them. Swanson feels the codes might be able to work more like a checklist. <br />Van Pelt stressed these codes effect more than just the Building Division, therefore <br />other Divisions need to be involved in the process. Russ feels Staff and the Board <br />need to make sure there is public involvement to ensure how these codes fit in with <br />Louisville. <br />REGULAR BUSINESS <br />Open Government Training <br />Staff informed the Board of the Spring Open Government Training date of Thursday, <br />April 25th at 6:30 pm in City Council Chambers. Geise, Van Pelt and Tew are to be in <br />attendance. <br />Comprehensive Plan Update — Energy Chapter <br />Russ led the discussion on the Comp Plan Update. The Comp Plan has been <br />reviewed by the Planning Commission and is scheduled for the April 2nd City Council <br />meetingwith possible adoption on April 16th. The Comp Plan will not be a regulator <br />g <br />toot of codes, but will serve as a guide. The Plan is different than previous Comp <br />Plans. The Comp Plan's Energy Chapter focuses on what the City should strive to <br />accomplish with new and updated codes. It calls for the City to stay current with the <br />codes as they are adopted by the ICC. This Plan will set a framework for other <br />Boards to follow. Johnson added he was impressed with Staff and the City with the <br />work that has been done on the Plan and stressed to the Board they should review <br />the Plan. Berry and Van Pelt both added this has been a great process to watch. <br />DISCUSSION <br />Projects for 2013 Building Code Board of Appeals <br />I. 2012 Building Codes <br />• Swanson stated he is reviewing the Significant Changes to the <br />2012 codes and will bring comments to the next meeting. Van <br />Pelt asked if there was an urgency to adopt the 2012 codes. <br />Russ replied the Board shouldn't wait too long to adopt the 2012 <br />codes because if not adopted it will affect the Cities Insurance <br />150 rating which will be raised if the City chooses to not adopt <br />the codes. Russ feels adopting the IgCC may be premature, but <br />the rest of the 2012 codes should be brought up for further <br />discussion. <br />Other Discussion Items <br />I. Updating Inspection Cards, Permit Cards & Handouts <br />• Staff mentioned the changes which have been made to the <br />applications and handouts and have given copies to the Board <br />members. Staff also mentioned finding in the Louisville <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.