My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Building Code Board of Appeals Agenda and Packet 2013 09 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2000-2019 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
2013 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
Building Code Board of Appeals Agenda and Packet 2013 09 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:00:20 PM
Creation date
6/25/2018 10:58:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BCBOAPKT 2013 09 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Building Code Board of Appeals <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 18, 2013 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />is the annual meeting where the Board can update the City Council with who they are <br />and what they do. <br />DISCUSSION <br />Projects for 2013 Building Code Board of Appeals <br />I. 2012 Building Codes <br />• Chief Parker and Fire Marshall Mestes discussed the residential <br />fire codes and what the Louisville Fire Protection District would <br />like to see. Mestes mentioned the townhomes and apartments <br />being built looks to be the possible trend from here on out for <br />new housing. He specifically mentioned the three story <br />apartments and three story townhomes currently being built in <br />Steel Ranch South and the fact fire sprinklers are required in one <br />but not the other based on the type of construction; multi -family <br />and single family attached. Van Pelt mentioned one is governed <br />by the IBC and the other the IRC. <br />Staff stated this is the beginning of the Code discussions and <br />more input will be needed from other departments, Boards and <br />Commissions and citizens and contractors. Staff has been in <br />contact with Tim Pate, Chief Building Official with the City & <br />County of Broomfield, and his research into other jurisdictions <br />and which have adopted the 2012 codes. Superior, <br />Westminster, and Boulder County have adopted the 2012 <br />Codes. <br />Geise asked if there is a height stipulation which would trigger <br />the fire sprinkler. Mestes stated he is unsure of the code without <br />a review in the book. Berry mentions townhouses and <br />condominiums are required to have a fire wall separating each <br />unit. Based on the IRC, a middle townhouse unit should have <br />firewalls on each side where if there were to be a fire, it should <br />have a minimal effect on the outside units. Van Pelt asked if the <br />IFC and IRC relate. Mestes stated they do. <br />Parker mentioned the fire sprinkler code was researched and <br />discussed in 2009 during the 2009 code adoption process and <br />the Fire District still fully endorses the fire sprinkler code. <br />Louisville has the highest residential fire loss/deaths in the Front <br />Range at six in the last 35 years with one in the last 20-25 years <br />being the normal. Even with the best training and equipment, <br />fire loss is still possible. In the Fire Districts research, it was <br />found the fires burn hotter and quicker. With the Louisville Fire <br />Protection District being an all -volunteer department, the <br />response time equation isn't always there. The biggest concern <br />is the feeling the code will stifle development. Parker states this <br />has not been found during research. In 2009, there wasn't the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.