My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2018 06 12 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2018 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2018 06 12 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
7/6/2018 11:41:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2018 06 12 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 12, 2018 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />first floors at 14-15 feet. Office tenants also want taller ceilings and need space for duct <br />work so developers need adequate space and height to attract tenants. Dean stated we <br />have the ability to make sure the design of taller buildings gives us a nice aesthetic. <br />Staff can look at a range of heights that allow for three-story buildings adding we likely <br />want a mix of two and three-story buildings in these areas. <br />Questions for Council for feedback tonight: <br />1. Is Council supportive of the heights envisioned by the South Boulder Road Small <br />Area Plan and McCaslin Small Area Plan Height Plans? <br />2. Should a Special Review Use be required for two and three story buildings where <br />specified under the South Boulder Road Small Area Plan or should more <br />consistency in process be provided between commercial areas? <br />3. For properties zoned AO and within the South Boulder Road Small Area Plan, <br />should a Code Amendment also be processed which would allow for taller <br />buildings in accordance with the vision set forth in the Building Height Plan? <br />4. For the properties zoned BO in the McCaslin Blvd. Small Area Plan, should 40 - <br />foot tall buildings continue to be permitted where the height plan limits buildings <br />to a maximum of 2 -stories? <br />5. Should the maximum height permitted for three -stories be increased from 35 feet <br />to 45 feet, including parapets or to some other specific height standard? <br />6. Where increased height is permitted, should additional architectural standards <br />such as setbacks on the third level or additional architectural features be <br />required? <br />Mayor Muckle stated that in general he is satisfied with the building stories as <br />envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan; we don't need to revisit or amend the <br />Comprehensive Plan but we need to clarify the heights. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated that the thought was the Small Area Plan process <br />would lead to other changes we need to make. She asked if this is that step in the <br />process. Dean stated yes, this is the way to take advisory policies and potentially put <br />them into regulatory policies. Director Zuccaro stated this is the chance to align the <br />different documents and decide what processes to put in place. <br />Public Comments <br />Jeff Sheets, Koelbel and Company, stated it is important to make a three story building <br />achievable; give enough height to reach three stories. He stated builders need 14-15 <br />feet for each story. He asked for practical rules that make it achievable. He added that <br />requiring the Special Review Use process for a development can make it hard to get <br />tenants. <br />Mayor Muckle stated he supports allowing heights that support the number of stories we <br />allow in those locations. He would like a recommendation from staff on when or if the <br />Special Review Use process is needed. He stated it is a good idea to align the vision <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.