My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2018 06 12 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2018 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2018 06 12 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
7/6/2018 11:41:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2018 06 12 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 12, 2018 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />systems. We can require the architecture keep the mechanical systems from view for <br />commercial buildings. <br />Mayor Muckle brought up the questions individually: <br />1. Is Council supportive of the heights envisioned by the South Boulder Road Small <br />Area Plan and McCaslin Small Area Plan Height Plans? <br />Mayor Muckle stated the general consensus tonight was that the Council wants to allow <br />enough height to get three stories. <br />2. Should a Special Review Use be required for two and three story buildings where <br />specified under the South Boulder Road Small Area Plan or should more <br />consistency in process be provided between commercial areas? <br />Council is willing have staff draft recommendations on what processes to use in what <br />locations. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton would like to see as much certainty baked in the process as <br />possible to reduce risk and uncertainty. <br />3. For properties zoned AO and within the South Boulder Road Small Area Plan, <br />should a Code Amendment also be processed which would allow for taller <br />buildings in accordance with the vision set forth in the Building Height Plan? <br />Council asked staff to draft recommendations for Council to consider. <br />4. For the properties zoned BO in the McCaslin Blvd. Small Area Plan, should 40 - <br />foot tall buildings continue to be permitted where the height plan limits buildings <br />to a maximum of 2 -stories? <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated we should treat these areas similarly to surrounding <br />properties with similar rules. Mayor Muckle agreed. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated there is a lot of elevation variation in the McCaslin <br />Boulevard area that should be considered in the guidelines. <br />5. Should the maximum height permitted for three -stories be increased from 35 feet <br />to 45 feet, including parapets or to some other specific height standard? <br />6. Where increased height is permitted, should additional architectural standards <br />such as setbacks on the third level or additional architectural features be <br />required? <br />Staff stated they got enough input on all the questions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.