My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2018 07 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2018 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2018 07 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
7/19/2018 8:51:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2018 07 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 3, 2018 <br />Page 5 of 11 <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton suggested addressing this in the 2019 work plan. It will likely <br />make it safer for cyclists and should be considered for next year. Councilmember <br />Maloney stated he likes this idea. He agreed it would be a good 2019 item but would <br />like to be cautious. Council members were in agreement. <br />Staff is seeking confirmation from City Council that it is acceptable to enter into an <br />exclusive agreement with Zagster/Pace allowing them to be the only bike share <br />operator in Louisville for two years. This would allow for both dockless and docked <br />bicycles but require locking to a bike rack or docking station. There would be no cost to <br />the city but it would be exclusive for Zagster/Pace and not allow other companies for <br />two years. There is some funding budgeted for this and would keep there for any <br />possible upgrades such as dock stations. <br />Councilmember Keany asked how the City can limit this to one company. Attorney Light <br />stated the issue is using public property for docking stations requires a licensing <br />agreement and making it exclusive. It does not preclude any person from riding another <br />provider's bike into or through town. <br />Councilmember Keany stated he supports the contract but doesn't want the contract to <br />limit free enterprise or someone using private property for these uses. He supports the <br />lock to or docking model and not the ones that allow for leaving them anywhere. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if it perhaps an RFP should be done if this is going to be <br />exclusive. Councilmember Leh agreed and asked if this would meet our procurement <br />rules. Attorney Light stated he could take a closer look; this proposed model has no cost <br />to the City other than soft costs which can include staff and Council time to research <br />and prepare an ordinance concerning bike sharing programs. <br />Councilmember Leh and Mayor Muckle agreed with Councilmember Keany related to <br />free enterprise. <br />Deputy City Manager Davis stated part of the reason staff looked at this vendor in <br />particular was the model for the lock to component and our neighbors are looking at the <br />same vendor. This gives us the opportunity to work with Commuting Solutions for <br />marketing across all of the communities. <br />Councilmember Leh stated he is not sure the case for exclusivity has been rnet: <br />Mayor Muckle stated he supports moving this forward. Attorney Light stated staff will <br />look to make sure the purchasing polices are met and this will come back for approval if <br />a contract is agreed upon. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated for now this should be moved forward and can be <br />revisited in two years. Members agreed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.