My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 07 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2018 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 07 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:28 PM
Creation date
7/20/2018 9:23:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2018 07 17
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 3, 2018 <br />Page 4 of 11 <br />Councilmember Maloney asked if those three projects are the best projects. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated the list was decided to be the best regional list. <br />Councilmember Maloney noted he would support using the Subregional money <br />($8.15M) to support the regional projects. Mayor Muckle and Councilmember Loo <br />agreed. <br />Mayor Muckle stated he supports criteria that moves the most people and solves <br />congestion, helps air quality, and also what help the smaller towns get funding. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if any of the conversation is designed to restrict growth. <br />Without consideration of reducing development it will be the same problem in a few <br />years. Perhaps that should be an incentive or part of the criteria. <br />Councilmember Loo asked how affordable housing and mass transit might fit in that <br />conversation. Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated he wasn't addressing that, just that adding <br />more roads only attracts more people and the process continues. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated the conversation about growth boundaries and <br />transportation aren't currently connected to these transportation dollars. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked if a compromise is proposed to perhaps only do a <br />third of the money toward the regional projects, would Council be supportive. Council <br />was supportive. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann noted if the regional projects are not approved, then she <br />believes the projects would have to be scored in the subregional process. <br />Transportation Matters - Deputy City Manager Davis noted the City of Louisville recently <br />participated in an initiative to work with local businesses throughout the region to talk <br />with them about transportation challenges and look at the Northwest Area Mobility <br />Study (NAMS) projects our region has prioritized and get their feel for how it might or <br />might not address what their needs are. <br />Davis asked for direction on whether or not Council is interested in pursuing any <br />changes to local policy to implement new safety stop legislation in light of SB18-144. <br />The bill allows for local regulation to be implemented so a bicyclist approaching a stop <br />sign must slow to a reasonable speed and, when safe to do so, may proceed through <br />the intersection without stopping. A bicyclist approaching an illuminated red traffic <br />control signal must stop at the intersection and, when safe to do so, may proceed <br />through the intersection. We don't have to address this issue unless we want to change <br />our own rules. <br />Staff has discussed the pros and cons of this and what resources it would require. <br />When discussing with our neighbors, they are not making changes at this time. Staff <br />suggests waiting to see what other communities do before making changes. <br />31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.