My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 07 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2018 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 07 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:28 PM
Creation date
7/20/2018 9:23:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2018 07 17
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 3, 2018 <br />Page 10of11 <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton left the meeting at 8:57 pm. <br />Director DeJong stated the land swap with Voltage had not been abandoned but they <br />are working on financing for the new building which has been challenging. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked if the current building has outstanding building <br />permits and the approximate value of those projects. Director DeJong stated those <br />expenditures are short-term and don't preclude the larger development approved last <br />year. Councilmember Stolzmann asked if there is a time frame for demolition. Director <br />DeJong stated they need to work out the financing prior. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated we always have to be looking at potential for the future. <br />We are talking about $28,500 to provide information on what might be possible in that <br />area. He felt this is an investment in information to help make policy decisions in the <br />future. Mayor Muckle agreed the information is likely to be valuable. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated the scope of work #1) states the consultant will meet <br />with the Louisville Revitalization Commission (LRC) for site issues. She questioned <br />whether the LRC should be consulted on that and suggested the consultant should <br />meet with staff from Planning and Public Works. Members agreed. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked what the scope of work point # 2) meant. Are they <br />asking consultant to make recommendations to make changes to the zoning standards <br />and guidelines for parking for this area. Director DeJong noted it is background <br />information so it complies with the existing rules. Councilmember Stolzmann suggested <br />adding a sentence in the second bullet "and comply with the rules in your proposal". <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she hoped the authority given to the LRC was <br />considered throughout this process. <br />Councilmember Loo stated that related to #2 in the scope of work, if the rules are <br />hampering the best way to build on a lot, the consultant should also tell us that. We <br />should ask for an honest analysis from the consultant on what is the optimal design <br />regardless of if it meets the regulations and if changes are needed. Councilmember Leh <br />agreed. Director DeJong stated he felt LRC was looking for that as well. <br />Mayor Muckle noted he does want to make the recommended change to the first scope <br />of work point as suggested for staff consultation. <br />Attorney Light noted Council approval is required for the LRC to enter into this contract. <br />Motion: Councilmember Loo moved to approve the agreement by and between the LRC <br />and Desmond Inc. for consultant services, with the change to #1 in exhibit B the scope <br />of work to have the consultant meet with Public Works and/or Planning staff of the City <br />of Louisville. Councilmember Leh seconded. <br />37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.