My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2018 08 20
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2018 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2018 08 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:20 PM
Creation date
8/27/2018 10:13:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2018 08 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 18, 2018 <br />Page2of9 <br />Chuck Thomas asked if staff was looking for an exterior or an interior space. <br />Trice replied that everything was on the table. She called the Commission's attention to <br />Commissioner Ulm's email outlining his thoughts on the possible locations in the email provided <br />to the Commission and entered it into the record. <br />Fahey stated that she liked the museum location as a final destination, but thought it should be <br />displayed somewhere in the interim. She suggested a space at the library or John Breaux Park. <br />Dickinson stated that South Boulder and Main could be an option, but the City did not own <br />property there. He noted that the advertising nature of the sign might confuse people. <br />Trice interjected that there was a tiny bit of right-of-way in that location between Main and the <br />railroad tracks. <br />Chuck Thomas suggested putting it on the South Street underpass either on an existing <br />structure or on a pole erected for the purpose of holding the sign. He also suggested the parking <br />lot next to Steinbaugh Pavilion. <br />Haley read Commissioner Ulm's recommendations for locations from his email, which included <br />the Pavilion, John Breaux Park, and the Arts Center. <br />Parris stated the Museum was the best place long-term. She agreed with Dickinson's point that <br />the sign was meant to be an advertisement and might confuse people depending on where it <br />was placed. She recommended interpretive signage to explain the presence of the sign. <br />Haley responded that the underpass location might be too low to keep the sign safe and the <br />location on South Boulder Road might make people think that the Blue Parrot was still open. <br />Haley, Fahey, and Parris agreed that inside the library could be the best location. Dickinson <br />added that the interior of the library would provide an up -close experience with the sign. All <br />agreed that this would be a good temporary location until the museum could take it. <br />Chuck Thomas stated that the space needed for the sign might detract from the library <br />collections. <br />Fahey responded that it could be in a case that showed only one side. <br />Dickinson added that the library location might be a less expensive option. <br />Haley stated that an indoor location might preclude the need to light up the sign. <br />Fahey and Haley discussed the possibility of a roped -off area. She asked if mounting it on the <br />wall in the library would be costly. Fahey mentioned a neon sign exhibit at the Arvada Center <br />that had roped -off areas for the sign as an example of what the library could do. <br />Trice reminded the Commission that the next step was to take recommendations and flesh out <br />how much they would cost and if they were feasible. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.