Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 28, 2018 <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />will make sense, what will be successful, and what our residents will like 20 years from <br />now. <br />Councilmember Keany wants something to bring vibrancy and vitality to the area; to the <br />whole McCaslin corridor. He would like a viable project that comes to fruition and draws <br />people and activity to the area. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann wants the goals outlined in the RFP met. She wants to align <br />rent rates with what the market will bear. Success is more than just doing something, <br />we also need to be cost effective and fiscally responsible. <br />Councilmember Maloney agrees the goals in RFP are important. We need Tong -term <br />economic benefit to the City's sales tax, a magnet to community and business. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton wants some renewed notoriety and interest in the property and <br />some redefinition of what the market is. He wants to know what the highest and best <br />use is under the conditions; set the expectations for the realities in that area. <br />Councilmember Loo would like to net an extra $2M or more in revenue, property, or <br />sales tax. <br />Councilmember Leh hopes we get activation; to get people excited about the property <br />and area. He hopes the consultants will not shrink from giving Council bad news to the <br />extent that we need to hear it. Teach us something about the assumptions we are all <br />making. Help us be able to explain this to the public, what has gone wrong and what <br />can go right. <br />Michael Menaker was interested in what we cannot accomplish, what is beyond our <br />ability. We don't have enough resources; what are the things not to waste time on due <br />to property and market limitations. <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION — PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF SIX -YEAR <br />STAFFING PLAN <br />Director Hix stated this is a historic view and how the FTE's fit in the budget, the <br />programs and subprograms, and the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Input was <br />given from directors and most division managers as to what was needed in the 6-year <br />staffing plan. All requests seemed reasonable until they were all put together. Directors <br />did discuss each department's wishes and looked at the whole picture. <br />Some themes and patterns emerged during the discussions: supportive staff, requests <br />for process improvement, better technology, and discussion of service levels. Work load <br />was identified as an issue in exit interviews. She noted a large number of employees <br />are losing Personal Leave Bank. All of these considerations went into the staffing plan. <br />