My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 09 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2018 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 09 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:29 PM
Creation date
9/21/2018 10:04:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
8D6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2018 09 17
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
596
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 4, 2018 <br />Page 13 of 14 <br />Randy Caranci, 441 Elk Trail, Lafayette, owner of 540 Front Street, stated he currently <br />has a lease at 500 Front for 22 feet from center of the tracks, 25 would put a jog in the <br />fence of three feet from 540 to 544 Front. The 22 feet helps as people use that area for <br />access. 18 feet would be optimal as that is what is on the north side of Pine Street and <br />allows for parking. If the fence is completed at 22 or 25 feet it will be done and won't be <br />able to ever change it. He wants to be sure he is treated fairly, need to get extra footage <br />for parking. He said he does not remember getting notice. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated this is a priority and we funded Dillon at $400K and it <br />is now $632K. She proposed funding the Dillon increase from CIP and asking Lafayette <br />to fund increases at Baseline, and to ask the Revitalization Commission to help fund the <br />projects. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated we are committed to all of the crossings. We made a <br />commitment let's find a way to fund the quiet zones. Mayor Muckle agreed; this is a high <br />priority and has been for a long time. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated parking is important for downtown. She asked if there <br />is any way to get BNSF to go to the 18 feet, it worked on the north side, it should work <br />on the south. If 18 feet can't work find a way to increase parking in that area equal to <br />what we are losing to counterbalance the loss. <br />City Manager Balser stated it took a long time to get to where we are working with <br />BNSF. We can continue to discuss fencing but it may delay implementation of the quiet <br />zones. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked why 18 feet is allowed on the north side of Pine <br />Street but not south of Pine Street. She asked why BNSF is holding up the two <br />crossings that are nowhere near where the fence issue is. <br />Director Kowar stated 25 feet is their standard, 22 is what we are holding at. If we feel <br />strongly about the 18 feet we can push that, but we may have to accept 22 to get the <br />quiet zones in all at the same time. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated he is confused about the ownership of the land. Does <br />BNSF own this land or is it private or City? Director Kowar said it is BNSF right-of-way. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked what incentive they have to give up anything. We don't <br />have much leverage. Director Kowar agreed, the City is trying to be a facilitator for this. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if we have setbacks in the Code about how far away from <br />the fence parking is allowed. Director Kowar noted it still would be BNSF right of way, <br />our code would allow parking right up to the fence. <br />51 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.