My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2018 09 11 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2018 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2018 09 11 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
10/3/2018 9:48:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2018 09 11 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 11, 2018 <br />Page 7 of 13 <br />Councilmember Maloney asked if this would include easements and land dedications. <br />Attorney Light stated the language in this goes into the takings provision of the <br />constitution and adds the phrase "or reduced in fair market value by government law or <br />regulation." This creates the possibility that every act of police power (zoning, <br />subdivision regulations) could be challenged by effect on property value. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann recommended opposition. She provided examples of how a <br />municipality could get sued for any number of issues. A similar measure passed in <br />Oregon and cost billions to tax payers and was repealed. There are already adequate <br />protections in the takings language, this creates total gridlock for local governments. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann moved staff come back with a resolution in opposition to <br />Amendment 74, Councilmember Leh seconded. <br />Councilmember Leh agreed it would lead to many more potential claims and was in <br />favor of continuing with current protections. <br />All in favor. <br />3. Amendments Y&Z, Fair Maps Colorado <br />Amendments Y&Z are referred measures from the Colorado General Assembly <br />that relate to Congressional and state legislative redistricting. Amendment. Y <br />would create a commission to redraw congressional boundaries after the 2020 <br />census; Amendment Z would do the same for state legislative redistricting. Both <br />amendments received unanimous, bi-partisan support in the legislature, <br />stemming from a broad commitment to an independent commission model that <br />eliminates the role of political leadership and judges and reduces the politics in <br />redistricting. This is important to the City of Louisville and its residents, as a fair <br />redistricting process will help ensure the representation of local communities over <br />partisan politics. The Metro Mayors Caucus is supporting these measures. Staff <br />recommends the City SUPPORT this measure. <br />Motion: Councilmember Leh moved to bring back a resolution of support of <br />congressional redistricting amendment Y, Councilmember Keany seconded. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann felt this does not impact our local government directly and <br />while supportive, she would rather not take a position. <br />Councilmember Leh disagreed and said this does impact us directly by appropriately <br />non -gerrymandered districts, a fundamental right we should be supporting. State and <br />congressional redistricting will affect how we are represented and it is incumbent on us <br />as a part of the larger system to be supportive. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.