My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Building Code Board of Appeals Minutes 1996
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS
>
1996-1999 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
1996 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
Building Code Board of Appeals Minutes 1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:01:12 PM
Creation date
10/4/2018 10:24:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BCBOAMIN 1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
documentation which the board would receive <br /> Sam Light- On page 2 of the ordinance rt is stated that there must be three members present for a <br /> quorum. When an appeal is decided there needs to be at least three votes. <br /> Tim Pate - What if there was a conflict of interest with several board members with regard to a <br /> particular appeal and the board was unable to have a quorum? <br /> Sam Light- The State Code of Ethics has a concept called the rule of necessity which says that <br /> even though you may have a conflict of interest, if your participation is needed to render a <br /> discussion, you may participate. You still have to go though the process of disclosing your <br /> conflict and filing your written disclosure If we were at a meeting where three board members <br /> were present, I would ask if the applicant were willing to continue the hearing,rather than ask the <br /> one with the conflict of interest to participate. If the applicant did not want to continue,they <br /> could demand a hearing, and would I ask that board member to participate. <br /> Chris Greenwald - Could we provide to the board a sheet outlining some of the highlights of the <br /> rules of procedure such as how many votes in the affirmative would be required to approve an <br /> appeal. <br /> Sam Light- Yes. The other thing I will prepare is a script, which is most helpful to the <br /> Chairman. What that does is go through the procedures of a hearing chronologically This <br /> ensures that there is due process. This ensures that everybody who has a right to be heard is <br /> alerted to that fact. <br /> Greg Culhson- So then there is some typical verbiage to the swearing in? <br /> Sam Light- Yes. There is an oath to give to the witnesses. <br /> Erik Hartronft- Page 3, item F,talks about the board not having authority to interpret certain <br /> provision of the code. Does the Board make that determination? Does the Building Official <br /> have the ability to say that the appeal which is applied for cannot be heard by the board? <br /> Sam Light- That is a ruling which the board ultimately has to make. <br /> Erik Hartronft- So anybody can appeal anything, and the board would determine if it meets the <br /> rule? <br /> Sam Light- Correct. As secretary, Tom would advise the applicant that there may be <br /> jurisdictional problems. He would then refer the application to me. We would then schedule a <br /> hearing and in the packet I would include a memo concerning the jurisdictional issues. You <br /> would then need to convene and first give an answer on the jurisdictional issue, as to whether <br /> the Board would hear the appeal. <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.