My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Building Code Board of Appeals Minutes 1996
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS
>
1996-1999 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
1996 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
Building Code Board of Appeals Minutes 1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:01:12 PM
Creation date
10/4/2018 10:24:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BCBOAMIN 1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
each board member, for review, a copy of the application " I would recommend that we <br /> change that "may"to "shall" I would like to know that we are going to get our packets a certain <br /> number of days prior to the hearing so that we have sufficient review time <br /> Tom Talboom- There is no intention of not providing the board a report in writing. Changing <br /> that to shall would just firm up what our intention is. <br /> Erik Hartronft- There is a time element I would like to add. I would like to have at least a week <br /> to review the material. <br /> Sam Light-The way the by-laws are set up now is that someone has to put in an application at <br /> least 30 days in advance of a hearing. The application must be complete before the secretary will <br /> schedule a hearing. <br /> Tom Talboom-My intent was to have information at least 10 working days prior to a hearing. <br /> That is the only way I can see staff having enough time to compile the information and getting it <br /> to the board. <br /> Sam Light- The by-laws are set up so that we will not be advising the board of a hearing three <br /> days before a schedule meeting date. The applicant needs to understand that we will not <br /> schedule a hearing until we have a complete application. So if it is the second week of the month <br /> and we are scheduled to meet 10 days later, and someone comes in with an appeal, they will be <br /> asked to consent to be heard at, five or six weeks off, or a hearing will be scheduled thirty days' <br /> out. <br /> Chris Greenwald-If an applicant demands a hearing within thirty days are we not supposed to <br /> provide that hearing within 30 days? <br /> Sam Light- Ordinance 1214 and the by-laws state that once we get the completed application, <br /> we hold a hearing within 30 days,unless the applicant consents to a later date. <br /> Tom Talboom -If the next scheduled board meeting works for the applicant, even though it was <br /> more than 30 days away, that is when we would schedule it. If the applicant wants the hearing <br /> within 30 days,then we would have to go ahead and try to schedule a special hearing. That is <br /> where my policy of having 10 working days to prepare a packet for the board comes in. We <br /> would then look at what would be available after the 10 working days to be set up On the <br /> application it will be shown that no hearing will be prior to 10 working days from receipt of a <br /> completed packet. <br /> Erik Hartronft-I would be happy with receiving information the Friday before a Thursday <br /> meeting. I feel that the applicant is required to do certain things, we as a board are required to do <br /> certain things, I need to have staff be required to do certain things. I don't feel that it would be <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).