Laserfiche WebLink
authority to vary the code. The code requires 36 inches. <br /> Ray Schlott-It sounds like the window is certainly large enough that may be we can vary the <br /> point at which we start the measurement. <br /> Bob Spencer-My concern is with anchoring a new interior window well. What happens when <br /> the extenor one rots out. You cannot secure an interior frame to the exterior frame because when <br /> the exterior frame rots out you then have two bad frames. <br /> Tom Aten-Tom and I have agreed to some exterior solutions. The purpose of my coming to the <br /> Board was to avoid those solutions. <br /> Greg Cullison-I can understand the concerns here. I do feel we need to get back to the matter at <br /> hand, and get back to the acceptability of the product as it was used. <br /> Giles Schurman-I agree. <br /> Public Hearing Closed/Board Discussion -Motion <br /> Ray Schlott-I have a motion to deny the application. I move that the City of Louisville Code <br /> Board of Appeals find that the materials proposed by the applicant are not equivalent to those <br /> prescribed in the Uniform Building Code adopted by the City for the following reason- "The <br /> install window wells are not pressure treated and therefor do not meet the U.B C Further that <br /> the DAP product, as applied by the builder, does not make it an equivalent to pressure treated <br /> lumber for this application. <br /> Motion seconded by Greg Cullison. <br /> Roll Call Vote - Bob Spencer-Yes, Greg Cullison-Yes, Giles Schurman-Yes, Erik Hartronft <br /> - Yes, Ray Schlott- Yes. Motion is approved by 5 - 0 vote <br /> 5 Date and time for the next meeting: The next meeting of the Board will be on Thursday <br /> July 17th at 7 00 P.M. <br /> 6 Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 9 45 p.m. <br /> 10 <br />