My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Building Code Board of Appeals Minutes 1998
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS
>
1996-1999 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
1998 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
Building Code Board of Appeals Minutes 1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:01:12 PM
Creation date
10/4/2018 10:26:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BCBOAMIN 1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
installed,which makes sense to me. <br /> Tom Talboom—These are the concepts which are in the International Plumbing Code. <br /> They have been tested throughout time. There was some testimony which was given by <br /> plumbers that it would be cost prohibitive to buy all the standards which are referenced in <br /> the code. The identical standards are referenced in the Umform Plumbing Code. So they <br /> would still need those standards. Those are nationally recogmzed standards which are <br /> referenced. <br /> This is the direction codes are going. Performance based codes. If it meets health and <br /> life safety, and functions,that is the direction we want to go <br /> Sam Light—The result that you will have with that sort of system is that you will shift <br /> the dispute from the body which makes the restrictive code and us. State Board verses <br /> the municipality,to the municipality against the designer In a performance based <br /> system, as an inspector,you will be making more subjective calls with regard to if <br /> something is going to perform or not. <br /> Tom Talboom—That is where the standards come in. If it has been tested there should <br /> not be a problem. <br /> If there is any other information the Board would like to have just let me know I will <br /> send everyone a copy of the 1997 I.P C and the '97 UPC to '97 IPC comparison. <br /> We do have some video training tapes on the I.P C. Would the Board like to have those <br /> as part of a public hearing, or do some work shops first with just the Board. <br /> Board consensus—We would like to view the videos as a work shop session. <br /> Giles Schurman—When do you want to start the public hearing process? <br /> Tom Talboom—After education for the this Board,we would start that process and we <br /> should probably meet at least once a month. <br /> 5 Setting date and time for next meeting: The next meeting was schedule for June 176, <br /> 1999, at 7.00 p.m. <br /> 6. Adjournment: Meeting adjourned at 8.20 p.m. <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.