My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Building Code Board of Appeals Minutes 1998
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS
>
1996-1999 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
1998 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
Building Code Board of Appeals Minutes 1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:01:12 PM
Creation date
10/4/2018 10:26:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BCBOAMIN 1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
That is what Jefferson County is doing now Much more so then what Carbon Dale did. <br /> Greg Cullison—I had heard that when Longmont adopted the IPC they amended it to the <br /> point that it was very similar to the UPC <br /> Tom Talboom—I will find out what all the Jurisdictions have done and get copies to all <br /> the board members. I will also make a copy of the sunset review report with regard to the <br /> State Plumbing Code. <br /> Ray Schlott—Three are only a few things in the IPC which are really controversial. One <br /> is the use of plastic water pipe, and the use of Studor vents. <br /> Tom Talboom—IAPMO has approved Studor vents. The state will not approve them. It <br /> is the same with flexible gas lines,they have a UL and IAPMO listings. That is one of <br /> the problems local jurisdictions have, is they cannot get any findings of fact, or <br /> conclusion of law, from the State Plumbing Board concerning these issues. They are just <br /> turning these things down with no written explanations,as to cause. <br /> I went to the State Plumbing about 3 years ago and asked for relief from Appendix C, <br /> which specifies the number of plumbing fixtures required. We had a bagel shop go in <br /> with an occupant load of 20, and according to the pluming code appendix they were <br /> required to have a women's restroom, and a men's restroom. You had to have a water <br /> closet,urinal and a lay in the men's room and in the women's you had to have a water <br /> closet and a lay Then there is footnote that you have to have the same number of fixtures <br /> in the women's as in the men's,to make them equal. So then you have to add another <br /> water closet to the women's restroom. So for a small bagel shop you had to have four <br /> toilets. I asked for relief in writing to the Colorado Plumbing Board. I never did get a <br /> response. When I called them they advised me that I had been turned down. I asked for <br /> something in writing. Their response was,"we don't do that" So I wrote another letter <br /> to appeal. I went before them in person and they said"sounds like a good thing,you can <br /> do that" I asked for something in writing,they responded no we don't do that,but it still <br /> is okay <br /> That is the way it is to deal with the State Plumbing Board. <br /> Charles Keim—It would seem to me that one of the most difficult things in using any <br /> code, is inconsistency Take Jefferson County,how are you supposed to know what is <br /> and what is not adopted if you buy a Code Book. Do you then need to buy a copy from <br /> each City, or can you buy one copy and use it in all the Cities? It sounds like you can't <br /> Tom Talboom—That is why the International Codes have come about, one code that you <br /> can use throughout the entire country I would rather see us adopt the International Code <br /> outright. The State has amended the Umform Plumbing Code in several area's which <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.