My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 11 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2018 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 11 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:29 PM
Creation date
11/13/2018 9:32:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
8D6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2018 11 05
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
766
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 12, 2108 <br />Page 8 of 10 <br />with the broker community and retailers to see what they are looking for but the spaces <br />that are vacant are challenging to fill. <br />Councilmember Keany agreed we would like to see more results, but funding may not <br />be the key to that. Members generally agreed. The Council can discuss other options <br />for retail recruitment next year. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked about the large increases in Cultural Arts, do we want <br />to have such large increases. Deputy City Manager Davis stated $25K is for public art, <br />$5000 for grants and $10,000 for programming for the Arts Center. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann was concerned the increases were for larger events; she <br />prefers the lower key, smaller events than the larger ones for which she gets <br />complaints. Mayor Pro Tem Lipton confirmed the increases are for smaller events. <br />2019-2024 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN <br />Councilmember Loo asked about the funding for Museum design in 2020. She does not <br />support keeping it in until we have a citizen survey where that museum ranks on a <br />larger list of what citizens want. Leaving it in creates an expectation we will fund it. <br />City Manager Balser stated polling on this will be done in 2019. Councilmember Keany <br />would leave it in for 2020; it can be changed based on the polling results. Mayor Muckle <br />agreed. Councilmember Leh feels leaving it in does not cost us anything at this point <br />and the Museum has inherent benefit to the community. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated one reason for leaving it in might be if there is a citizen's <br />initiative. It might be in our interest to do some design so we know how much it will cost <br />and what numbers to use. Councilmember Maloney stated if we do that it will need to <br />include an understanding of the operating costs as well. <br />Members agreed to leave it in for now knowing it might be changed. <br />Members reviewed the CIP projects. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated the 2020-2024 DRCOG TIP subregional funding <br />process is still not determined. One theme has been that people need to come to the <br />table with a 50% match for projects. If we want to be competitive for funding we need to <br />have at least 50% of the project funds budgeted. <br />She stated citizens are clear they want an underpass at South Boulder Road. That <br />project is different from the other projects in the Transportation Master Plan (TMP). She <br />would like to put at least $3.5M in our budget and ask for $3.5 from subregional funding. <br />She would like to split the City's $3.5 with the LRC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.