Laserfiche WebLink
Resource Number: 5BL8039 <br />Temporary Resource Number: NjA Architectural Inventory Form <br />(Page 4 of 5) <br />VI. SIGNIFICANCE <br />37. Local landmark designation: <br />Yes <br />No xx <br />Date of Designation: nia <br />38. Applicable National Register Criteria <br />xx A. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; <br />xx B. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; <br />xx C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or that <br />possess high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; <br />D. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield information important in history or prehistory; <br />Qualifies under Criteria Considerations A through G (see Manual). <br />Does not meet any of the above National Register criteria. <br />39. Area(s) of Significance: <br />Architecture; Community Planning and Development <br />40. Period of Significance: 1878 - 1950 <br />41. Level of Significance: <br />National: <br />State: <br />Local: xx <br />42. Statement of Significance <br />As Louisville's oldest known remaining residence, this building is historically significant, relative to National <br />Register Criterion A, for its association with the city's earliest development period, beginning in the 1870s. The <br />building is also significant, under National Register Criterion B, for its associations with Charles Niehoff, William <br />Austin, and Roy Austin (and their families), all of whom made particularly significant contributions to Louisville's <br />socioeconomic development. Finally, the house is architecturally significant, under National Register Criterion C, <br />as Louisville's oldest remaining example of a wood -frame cross gabled dwelling. <br />43. Assessment of historic physical integrity related to significance: <br />This building's historic integrity has been compromised by additions to the rear (west) elevation, by the application <br />of asbestos shingle siding, and by the alteration of some window openings. This loss of integrity, though, is <br />surpassed by the building's singular historic significance. The property is still able to convey a sense of its historic <br />past, and it is individually eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria A, B, and <br />C. <br />