Laserfiche WebLink
Resource Number: 5BL8009 <br />Temporary Resource Number: N/A Architectural Inventory Form <br />(Page 4 of 5) <br />VI. SIGNIFICANCE <br />37. Local landmark designation: <br />Yes <br />No xx <br />Date of Designation: nia <br />38. Applicable National Register Criteria <br />xx A. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; <br />B. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; <br />cc C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or that <br />possess high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; <br />D. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield information important in history or prehistory; <br />Qualifies under Criteria Considerations A through G (see Manual). <br />Does not meet any of the above National Register criteria. <br />39. Area(s) of Significance: <br />Architecture; Commerce <br />40. Period of Significance: ca. 1890 - 1950 <br />41. Level of Significance: <br />National: <br />State: <br />Local: xx <br />42. Statement of Significance <br />This property is historically significant, relative to National Register Criterion A, for its association with early <br />sustained commercial development in Louisville, in support of the area's coal mining industry. The building is <br />architecturally significant for its distinctive false front facade, and a as a representative late 19th Century / early <br />20th century commercial building. The building's significance in these regards is probably not to the extent that <br />would qualify it for individual listing in the National Register of Historic Places, however, it is eligible as a <br />contributing resource within a potential downtown Louisville Historic District. <br />43. Assessment of historic physical integrity related to significance: <br />Although this building has undergone changes to its facade, and exterior wall surfaces, it has not had any additions <br />within the past fifty years. It is unreasonable to expect the facades of commercial buildings to remain the same <br />as new businesses come and go. For this reason a greater latitude in assessing integrity should be applied. <br />