Laserfiche WebLink
Resource Number: 5BL8018 <br />Temporary Resource Number: N/A Architectural Inventory Form <br />(Page 4 of 5) <br />VI. SIGNIFICANCE <br />37. Local landmark designation: <br />Yes <br />No xx <br />Date of Designation: nia <br />38. Applicable National Register Criteria <br />A. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; <br />B. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; <br />C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or that <br />possess high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; <br />D. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield information important in history or prehistory; <br />Qualifies under Criteria Considerations A through G (see Manual). <br />xx Does not meet any of the above National Register criteria. <br />39. Area(s) of Significance: <br />Community Planning and Development; Commerce <br />40. Period of Significance: <br />41. Level of Significance: <br />National: <br />State: <br />Local: xx <br />42. Statement of Significance <br />This house was historically significant, relative to National Register Criterion A, for its association with residential <br />development in Louisville during the first half of the twentieth century. The house was architecturally significant <br />as well, under National Register Criterion C, as an example of a wood frame side gabled dwelling. Due to a <br />complete loss of integrity, however, the property should be considered ineligible for individual listing in the <br />National Register of Historic Places. It would also be a non-contributing property within a potential downtown <br />Louisville National Register historic district. <br />43. Assessment of historic physical integrity related to significance: <br />This house's historical integrity was severely impacted when it was added onto and renovated, probably in 1970. <br />The front porch has been moved from one side of the facade to the other, the red clay tile roof is not historic, nearly <br />all of the windows have been changed from their historic appearance, and the size of the original building has been <br />more than doubled. As a result, the building no longer conveys any sense of its historic significance. <br />