Laserfiche WebLink
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 17, 2008 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />Muth presented the members with a memo outlining what next steps are needed now <br />that the tax has been approved. She noted the following: <br />• There will be an estimated $340,000 available each year for the next ten years <br />for preservation programs in the downtown/old town area. <br />• The City Council will consider Ordinance No. 1544, Series 2008 for first reading <br />on November 18 and for second reading and a public hearing on December 2. <br />This ordinance will impose the 0.125% sales tax to commence January 1, 2009. <br />• The money from the tax can be spent under the following general guidelines: <br />• Incentives to preserve historic resources that qualify for listing on the <br />Louisville Register of Historic Places; <br />• Incentives to preserve buildings that contribute to the historic character of Old <br />Town but do not qualify for listing on the Louisville Register of Historic Places; <br />• Incentives for new buildings and developments in Old Town to meet <br />additional guidelines to maintain and complement the historic character of <br />Old Town; <br />• Staff time to administer these programs; <br />Muth asked for direction on the following: xx. <br />• What programs would the HPC like to implement first? Staff's suggestions <br />are: <br />o Surveying of the entire commercial districtix(estimated to be <br />approximately 70 buildings}; <br />o Establishing a grant fund for rehabilitation and repairs; <br />o Establishing a loan fund for rehabilitation and repairs; <br />o Establishing new "historic" design guidelines for the downtown <br />commercial district; <br />o Purchasing plaques for already landmarked properties; <br />o Getting permission from the Carnegie Library to scan their old <br />assessor cards and purchasing a scanner to do so; <br />• Should all funding be first-come, first-served or do we want to establish a <br />distribution percentage for residential versus commercial building? <br />• How do we want to distribute funds between buildings that qualify to be <br />landmarked, those that may not qualify but contribute to the character of Old <br />Town, and funding to encourage new development to meet new guidelines <br />for historic character? <br />• Do we want to establish a list of most important historic buildings i.e. a List of <br />Historic Significance (similar to the Open Space Advisory Board's "Open <br />Space Acquisition Rankings") to better help in determining where funds <br />should be spent? <br />• Should we consider conservation easements on any specific properties or <br />facades? <br />• Are there other programs you would like to consider for early <br />implementation? <br />Muth added that all programs, policies, and guidelines will require City Council approval <br />after the HPC has fleshed out the programs and made a recommendation. <br />Muckle stated that she thought the funds should be evenly distributed between the three <br />areas of incentives: 1. for buildings that qualify for landmarking, 2. buildings that don't <br />