Laserfiche WebLink
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />June 14th, 2017 <br />Page 5of7 <br />data is worth repeating, without any specific reason to reject it, adding that Tom was <br />careful with his methodology and analysis. She commented that she would rather see <br />the ranger writing tickets and working on enforcement than repeating the survey done <br />two years ago. Mike commented that the Near Term and the Long Term solutions to this <br />problem need to be kept distinct, but no data collection or Long Term solution should <br />preclude adopting the Near Term solutions. <br />Steve Rasor (409 Paradise Lane) liked the document. But he disagreed with the <br />suggestion of closing the western third of the property. He thought that would <br />concentrate over -use into the eastern part of DOLA. He would prefer to see the northern <br />third closed, along the property line that abuts his neighborhood. He thinks this would <br />reduce dust and stormwater run-off going north, provide a buffer between the DOLA and <br />his neighborhood, while retaining the long "run" valued by dog owners. Mr. Rasor <br />shared an article about dog issues in cities. He also mentioned that he recently called <br />code enforcement about a dog owner with too many dogs and they responded within 10 <br />minutes, which was a happy change. His experience has been that code enforcement <br />generally either came too late or never came at all. <br />Ember reported that Jim liked the framing of the top three ideas. He thought <br />there should be an environmental impact study on the land. He has noticed lots of dog <br />owners not watching their dogs. <br />Helen suggested adding "explore rotational closures within the DOLA" to the <br />document. Helen clarified that these are recommendations, but it is for staff and City <br />Council to figure out how to implement them. <br />Ember mentioned that Lafayette is beginning a zero tolerance policy on dog <br />issues, meaning no warnings given for off leash dogs or failure to scoop. <br />Mike suggested adding language about enforcing the rule that dogs remain on <br />leash until within the fence of the DOLA. <br />Graeme made a comment about the health risks associated with contaminated <br />dust from the DOLA being blown into Harper Lake. He asked whether OSAB would <br />recommend a study of raw Harper Lake coliform data. Mayor Muckle was under the <br />impression that this data was already being collected. Ember told him that according to <br />recent inquiry with Public Works, Harper Lake's water is only tested after treatment for <br />drinking. The board seemed to be interested in this idea. <br />Missy made a motion to approve the document as amended. Mike seconded. <br />The motion passed unanimously. Staff will take the document to discuss with Joe. Staff <br />will forward the document on to the City Council. <br />X. Review and Make Recommendations on the Bullhead Gulch Underpass <br />Design —Presented by: Cameron Fowlkes from Public Works, Civil Engineer III <br />Cameron introduced Frank and Andrew from Atkins, the design consultants <br />doing the presentation about the two underpass options. They have previously held a <br />public open house and given this presentation to PPLAB. They will present it to City <br />Council in July. Once the design has been decided upon, they will meet with the railroad. <br />The plan is to have the design completed by end of the year, for construction in 2019. <br />The funding for this project is coming from: The developers ($200 K), the City (-$500k <br />from the CIP and stormwater funds —no Open Space/Park Fund money), and Urban <br />Drainage ($500k, because the underpass is for drainage as well as for pedestrians). <br />Frank showed some animation about the underpass options. Both options are <br />the same on the east side: the differences are all on the west side approach. The first <br />option has an S-curve on the west side, the second option has more of a T-shaped <br />intersection. Laura asked how wide the trail would be, and was told 10 ft. Missy asked if <br />