My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2018 11 27
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2018 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2018 11 27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
12/19/2018 10:37:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2018 11 27
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November27 2018 <br />Page 10 of 12 <br />Councilmember Stolzmann thanked all applicants and board members for their service. <br />She noted the wealth of applicants for the LBoT She noted there are six boards with <br />only one applicant for multiple spots. She would like to readvertise for those six boards <br />for a larger diverse pool of candidates. <br />Councilmember Leh stated not having other applicants is not a reason not to appoint <br />the applicants we did get. If any applicant does not have enough votes to be appointed <br />we can go back out; but he worries about opening it up wholesale. <br />Councilmember Loo supported appointing Mr Menaker to the LRC. She feels he should <br />be appointed and to not appoint him when other boards have one applicant and we are <br />appointing them is inappropriate. Mr Menaker has done a great deal for the City and <br />she feels he should be appointed. She noted she has received letters from members of <br />the LRC supporting his reappointment. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann noted that last year for the Recreation Board there were <br />enough applicants but we turned away people and reopened the pool as Council <br />wanted a different mix of candidates. She does not want to appoint people to the LCC <br />who didn't apply when we are turning down other applicants for that board. This does <br />not give us the best outcome. She thinks we should readvertise for a larger pool of <br />people so we get a better mix of people. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated the Council should respect the process. He likes the <br />application process as redesigned last year He asked why the Committee wants to <br />discuss the reappointment of Mr Menaker <br />Mayor Muckle stated he suggested the discussion for two reasons. Mr Menaker has <br />been a great member of the community but perhaps is a lightning rod as well. He is <br />also reluctant to appoint him for another 5-year term which would give him 15 years on <br />the board without a new voice. <br />Councilmember Leh stated he is uncomfortable discussing a single candidate in the <br />absence of an interview of that candidate. He suggested the Council interview Mr <br />Menaker and then make a decision. If there are not the votes for a candidate to be <br />appointed than it may take care of itself <br />Mayor Muckle stated this is just a point of discussion; it can be done however Council <br />chooses. <br />Councilmember Loo stated there are other board members who have served on a board <br />for longer than 15 years. If he is still providing a valuable service to the community a <br />member should be reappointed. She would like him appointed without an interview <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.