My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2018 11 27
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2018 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2018 11 27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
12/19/2018 10:37:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2018 11 27
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November27 2018 <br />Page 3 of 12 <br />ON LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 2, THE BUSINESS CENTER AT CTC, REPLAT B - 2nd <br />READING, PUBLIC HEARING (advertised Daily Camera 11/11/18) <br />RESOLUTION NO. 53, SERIES 2018 — A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL <br />SUBDIVISION PLAT TO VACATE AN EXISTING LOT LINE AND AN AMENDMENT <br />TO THE FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION <br />OF AN ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING AND ASSOCIATED SITE <br />IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY AT 194 TAYLOR AVENUE <br />Mayor Muckle introduced the ordinance and resolution and opened the public hearing. <br />Planner Ritchie stated an updated resolution was presented to Council tonight. This is <br />an easement vacation, replat, and PUD amendment. She reviewed the site noting this <br />plan will vacate an existing lot line to make one lot and vacate an easement that is no <br />longer needed. The plan is for the construction of an addition to an existing building. <br />The plan does exceed the height limit but as it is architectural and does not include floor <br />area it meets the design guidelines. She reviewed the proposed materials; the metal <br />areas are an accent and meet the design guidelines. The proposal includes solar panels <br />on the existing building's roof and walls, this too meets the design guidelines. <br />The -applicant is requesting to defer 96 spaces of parking until such time as it is needed. <br />The applicant notes the parking is not needed for the current use of the building <br />however the PUD will include a note that the City can require the applicant construct the <br />deferred parking at any time. <br />Ritchie stated the application meets the IDDSG standards with a waiver for the parking <br />and the use of metal is appropriate. Staff recommends approval for both the ordinance <br />and the resolution. The new resolution includes conditions from Public Works. <br />Councilmember Maloney asked if the deferred parking will meet future needs and how it <br />can be enforced in later years. Ritchie stated this will be tracked on the PUD by a note. <br />It will be checked every time a tenant finish permit or business license is requested. <br />That is checked on every application. <br />Councilmember Maloney asked how the on -street parking is enforced and if employees <br />are using it. Ritchie noted the owner's association enforces the on -street parking <br />throughout the park. The PUD states the parking needs must be met on site. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked if this meets the 2 spaces per 1000. Ritchie stated <br />yes. Councilmember Stolzmann wonders why this size of a building does not require <br />more parking. Ritchie stated this will be reconfirmed when the interior building permits <br />are reviewed and it is clear how many people the building is serving. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.