Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 27 2018 <br />Page 5 of 12 <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION — DOWNTOWN PARKING STRUCTURE CONCEPTUAL <br />DESIGN <br />Mayor Muckle noted this is an opportunity for the City Council to give feedback on <br />options for parking in downtown. The Council did receive a request from the members <br />of the Revitalization Commission to continue this item. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she would like to discuss this tonight as it is on the <br />agenda. Many members of the public are interested in this and we owe it to them to <br />consider this and discuss it. This should not be dragged out further She stated she has <br />opposed and continues to oppose this project on the basis of three things: cost; short <br />and long-term need, including transportation technology changes; and neighborhood <br />character She stated there has been a parking issue downtown and Council has <br />addressed this by making significant investments by buying additional surface lots, <br />putting in time restrictions, doing better monitoring, and adding capacity She noted <br />parking is an issue in residential streets near offices, schools, and parks. She stated we <br />need to determine if we are interested in this or not and we should move on and not <br />waste time on this if the answer is no. <br />Councilmember Loo stated she does support the request for a continuance, traditionally <br />we have always honored such requests. She stated she sees no reason to depart from <br />that tradition; she supports continuing to January 22. <br />Councilmember Leh concurred with Councilmember Loo. In a small town we can make <br />such allowances for board members who may not be able to attend a Council meeting. <br />It is worthwhile to continue it for that reason. There is no time rush on this. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated Councilmember Stolzmann has a good point; <br />sometimes we postpone things too long. He stated in this case, however we have an <br />applicant who has asked for a postponement and we should respect the wishes of the <br />applicant. When we do discuss this in January we should be very clear about what our <br />interest and intent is. <br />Mayor Muckle stated he supports the continuance. He stated he supported the study to <br />see what this structure would look like. Having seen the designs now he doesn't see <br />how any of the structures are going to have an appearance of small-town character He <br />supports the continuance to January 22 so the LRC can present. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she does not feel items should be continued for the <br />illness of an applicant. She does not support delaying this for two months; if it is to be <br />delayed she would like it to be heard in the next few weeks. <br />Mayor Muckle stated January 22 was chosen to avoid the holidays but other dates can <br />be considered. <br />