My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2018 12 04
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2018 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2018 12 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
12/19/2018 10:37:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2018 12 04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 4, 2018 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />is based on the estimated cost of wages, benefits, supplies and services. The proposed <br />changes were provided in the packet. Staff recommends approval. <br />Councilmember Maloney noted the Finance Committee has been discussing fees <br />addressing costs better They decided there should be an annual review as some fees <br />have not been adjusted in many years. Fees should reflect costs over time. <br />Councilmember Maloney moved Council approve Resolution No. 58, Series 2018; <br />seconded by Councilmerriber Loo. Roll Call Vote 6-0 passed. Lipton absent. <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION/ACTION _ CITY MANAGER ONE-YEAR REVIEW <br />EVALUATION TOOL <br />Mayor Muckle asked if Council wanted to make changes to the evaluation tool and <br />whether they wanted to use a process that involves the City Attomey and Council or <br />hire a facilitator He noted Councilmember Maloney had done a lot of work on this. <br />Councilmember Maloney felt it important to have a tool to evaluate what the Council and <br />the Manager want to see in an evaluation. Several sources were reviewed to write this <br />draft. It includes a tool for each Councilmember to evaluate the Manager and then those <br />are consolidated for review by Council. The other option would be to have a third party <br />facilitator design and implement an evaluation with all Councilmembers taking part. <br />Councilmember Maloney noted the tool should be reviewed and modified each year as <br />a part of the annual contract with the Manager He supported a 360 process. <br />City Manager Balser appreciated being able to work with Councilmember Maloney She <br />asked if there were additional items the Council would like included in the evaluation <br />form and inquired if Council thought having a facilitator would be helpful. <br />Councilmember Loo asked City Attomey Kelly if this process would be confidential. The <br />answer was yes the performance review would be conducted in executive session. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked if the individual worksheets filled out by each <br />Councilmember could be part of the public record if the tool was used. City Attorney <br />Kelly didn't think so but asked for time to look into that for a more definitive answer <br />Mayor Muckle stated he likes the idea. <br />Councilmember Maloney liked the idea of picking and using a facilitator This allows the <br />Mayor to participate more. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann saw merits to both options. She wanted to talk as a group <br />regardless of the option used. Mayor Muckle agreed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.