My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2018 12 18
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2018 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2018 12 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
1/9/2019 9:28:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2018 12 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 18, 2018 <br />Page 12 of 14 <br />John Schneider, noted the list the church used for who received mail came from him <br />He stated he used the County Assessor's map to get the property names. It included <br />both tenants and residents There was no ill intent. <br />Jan Zimmerman, 821 Trail Ridge Drive, noted she is near the church, not within the <br />500-feet and is a church member The church voluntarily did the neighborhood <br />meetings to be transparent about the project. <br />Sandy Davidson, 897 Cleveland Court, noted her residence predated the church She <br />stated the definition of cemetery includes "remains of dead people" and felt this would <br />infringe on her peace of mind <br />Jennifer Lorenz noted there is no requirement the church send out notice It was a <br />courtesy She asked if the Special Review Use is a rezoning issue. She heard this <br />would not set precedent, believes that is not true We know for a fact that if go through <br />this process with other sites to be considered, Denver does this. She did not feel <br />Council is following the elements of the code with the definition of the code, there is an <br />obligation to consistently apply the law Establishment clause and free speech works <br />both ways and should protect both the church and the residents <br />Michael Scaer, 701 Church Lane, has lived there 23 years He asked if this is approved, <br />what will someone looking at a house see on the map He asked if it would be listed as <br />a cemetery He talked to a lot of neighbors and understands the concerns but wanted to <br />know what this will look like in 5 years <br />Gale Chapman, felt it was safe to say Council and Church members don't live in the <br />neighborhood and aren't impacted by this. He felt there still isn't real information about <br />property values and in the long-term it isn't known <br />Mayor closed the public hearing <br />Councilmember Stolzmann clarified the comments posted on the wall are only those <br />received since the packet was published and all previous ones were presented to <br />Council in the packet materials She noted the City does have a mailing requirement for <br />notices Ritchie stated there were two mailings at least 15 days prior to both Planning <br />Commission and City Council with a map and dates and times of meetings and staff <br />contact information Anyone can ask to see the list. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked about the size of the sign Ritchie stated it was the <br />same sign for both notices with updated information <br />Councilmember Leh stated regarding criteria 2 and the economic stability piece, he <br />does not want to minimize the property value piece, it is important. He read the criteria <br />and noted the need to be careful from a Council standpoint in requiring some positive <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.