My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 12 18
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2018 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 12 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:30 PM
Creation date
1/16/2019 9:14:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
8D6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2018 12 18
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 27, 2018 <br />Page 11 of 12 <br />Councilmember Maloney thinks Council should respect the process, there is one <br />candidate for one position. If any person is not meeting the expectations when on the <br />board he or she can be removed if it is appropriate. There is a good reason to have <br />turnover on a board, and that is up to us to do if it is appropriate. If we aren't going to <br />have term limits than we should put good effort into getting new people on boards. <br />However, we have those who applied and we should appoint those we want and <br />interview those we want. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked if those identified on the spreadsheet as <br />"appointment with no interview" can still be discussed by the Council. Mayor Muckle <br />stated any applicant can be discussed if Council would like to; tonight we only need to <br />decide who to interview. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she would like to interview the LCC applicants so the <br />process is consistent. <br />Mayor Muckle asked if anyone wants to interview anyone other than those <br />recommended. <br />Councilmember Maloney agreed with Councilmember Stolzmann that the LCC <br />members should be interviewed as there are more applicants than spots. Mayor Muckle <br />noted Ms. Layton did not apply specifically for the LCC but has been a strong member <br />of that board so the Committee recommended appointing her to the LCC again. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated that concerns her as there are other applicants for <br />the LCC for whom that was their primary choice. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated he wants to be consistent in the process. He asked if <br />Ms. Layton was interested on serving on the LCC. Muth stated Ms. Layton had been <br />contacted and she stated she would serve on the LCC or any other board the Council <br />would like to put her on. <br />Members discussed if more than just the LBoT applicants should be interviewed and if <br />the LCC members should be interviewed. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann reiterated she has concerns about process and who is <br />recommended for appointment. She suggested the six boards with only one applicant <br />have no appointments made and be reopened. <br />Mayor Muckle stated the Council can discuss any candidates it wants to. He is reluctant <br />to totally reopen the application process for some boards. He recommended changing <br />Mr. Menaker to "appoint with no interview" and proceed with the rest of the <br />recommendation as is, knowing the Council will discuss the candidates again before <br />appointments are voted on. Councilmember Loo seconded that recommendation. <br />36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.