My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2019 01 14
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2019 01 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:21 PM
Creation date
1/16/2019 2:32:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2019 01 14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 17, 2018 <br />Page 7 of 18 <br />Cyndi Thomas agreed and stated that it was a modern take on a traditional architecture, <br />which met the criteria to be respectful of the context and the surrounding mass and <br />scale. She added that attending to retail needs was important for a Main Street to <br />survive. <br />Haley stated that all the bullet points were addressed. <br />Fahey agreed and reminded the Commission that they had recommended approval of <br />the first design in 2017 and this proposal was even better. She still did not like the glass <br />and suggested taking Jean Morgan's suggestion that the windows be sloped or perhaps <br />tinted. <br />Parris replied that the glass was in the setbacks, which responded to the design <br />guidelines to minimize glass at the street level. <br />Ulm agreed with Commissioner Fahey that it was a better proposal than last time, <br />though he still did not get a western vibe from the two-story buildings. He liked their <br />attempt to maintain some of the open sidewalk space. <br />Chuck Thomas stated that he thought that the proposal attended to the guidelines and <br />that the new version was an improvement on the old one. In particular, he thought the <br />changes to the massing on the third story responded to the major concerns from 2017. <br />Haley asked for additional comments from the Commission. <br />Chuck Thomas recommended approval of the proposal. Ulm seconded. Roll call vote. <br />All in favor. Passed unanimously. <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION <br />Miner's Cabins <br />Chuck Thomas disclosed that he was part of a volunteer committee that was lobbying <br />the City to do the renovations for the structures. He asked if anyone had a problem with <br />him being part of the discussion. <br />Haley asked Director Zuccaro what he thought. <br />Zuccaro replied that for the sake of this conversation, it should be fine. Future meetings <br />on the miner's cabins might not be appropriate. <br />Dickinson stated that he thought this discussion was about location and not cost so he <br />thought it was fine for Commissioner Chuck Thomas to be involved. <br />Selvoski reviewed the history and status of the City's efforts to preserve the Lee Avenue <br />Miners Cabins. City Council identified two sites for additional analysis. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.