My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 01 08
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 01 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:30 PM
Creation date
1/16/2019 2:50:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
8D6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2019 01 08
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
717
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 18, 2018 <br />Page 5 of 14 <br />on religion or religious denomination and prohibits local governments from applying <br />zoning laws that unreasonably restrict religious uses within their jurisdictions. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if this is considered to be a religious use. City Attorney <br />Kelly noted the applicants have framed it as a part of their religious exercise at that site <br />which they want to be able to offer to their congregation. <br />Councilmember Leh asked how critical the applicant's characterization is. City Attorney <br />Kelly stated it is not determinative, but Council should take it into consideration along <br />with any presentation and public comments. The criteria in the LMC need to be applied <br />as is always the case. <br />Councilmember Leh stated he is concerned there is some ambiguity in the <br />characterization of the use, church vs. cemetery. He wonders how the lack in clarity in <br />the LMC might affect this application review. He was concerned the lack of clarity could <br />be a problem for the City. <br />City Attorney Kelly stated the City's use categories require a Special Review for both <br />churches and cemeteries and they have the same criteria. <br />Councilmember Leh asked if "compelling interest" should be more clear as the public <br />does not necessarily understand that legal term. <br />City Attorney Kelly stated the compelling interest comes into play if it can be shown that <br />a substantial burden has been placed on the exercise of the religious activity. Then the <br />government must demonstrate that the burden placed on the activity advances a <br />compelling interest in the least restrictive means possible. Courts will look at what <br />burden has been placed on the applicant under the strictest standards. Courts have <br />found that aesthetics and abstract traffic concerns are not compelling interests. <br />Applicant Presentation <br />Stephanie Lord, 917 Arapahoe Circle, pastor of Christ the Servant Lutheran Church <br />(CTS), stated this is a remembrance garden which will include the columbarium. She <br />noted cremated remains are inert and do not change over time. She noted each niche <br />has a granite faceplate only accessed by a special tool or key. The congregation has <br />worked for 18 months and learned a lot from their neighbors which is why they changed <br />the design to have the least neighborhood impact and be an internal resource to the <br />church. The location of the columbarium was moved so it is walled in and accessible <br />only through the sanctuary when the church is open, primarily daytime hours. The <br />visible part is the 7'4" wall that matches the building and it will be landscaped. <br />The church has been at this location for 30 years and this remembrance garden is one <br />percent of the total footprint. The church averages three memorial services per year <br />and she sees no reason to think that will increase. <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.