My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Building Code Board of Appeals Agenda and Packet 2019 01 17
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2000-2019 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
Building Code Board of Appeals Agenda and Packet 2019 01 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:00:21 PM
Creation date
1/22/2019 3:15:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BCBOAPKT 2019 01 17
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Created:
1/22/2019 3:15 PM
Modified:
1/22/2019 3:15 PM
Text:
http://www.louisvilleco.gov/
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LCity,/ Department of Planning and Building Safety <br />Louisville <br />COLORADO .SINCE 187749 Main Street • Louisville CO 80027 • 303.335.4592 • www.LouisvilleCO.gov <br />Root does a quick overview and explanation of adopting the above 2018 codes and <br />amendments. <br />Root explains the appendixes the City is adopting and reasoning behind it. Within the <br />IRC, the appendixes we are proposing to adopt are A, C, D, F, H, J, M, P, and T. In the <br />IBC, the appendixes are C, F, I, J, K, and N. <br />He mentions that swimming pool and fencing codes are no longer separate codes but <br />are now included in the 2018 IRC and IBC. Other than the IRC, IBC, and IFC, the rest of <br />the code books have very few amendments. <br />Ramsey asks for clarification with Root that all decks need to submit engineered plans. <br />Root confirms this and explains that most plan reviews submitted for decks are not <br />drawn clearly and often staff has to help re -design the plans in order to make sure it <br />meets the minimum code requirements. This in return becomes much too time <br />consuming for staff. <br />Root explains that in the IRC, work can be exempt from getting a permit as long as the <br />work is done by a homeowner and the valuation of the job does not exceed $500.00. <br />With our new adoption of the codes, we are increasing the valuation amount to <br />$2,500.00. Root confirms that this exemption would not include any structural or <br />electrical work. We are also increasing our Temporary Certificate of Occupancy fee to <br />$600.00 in order to deter companies from wanting a TCO than a CO. Once a CO is <br />issued, a portion of the TCO fee will be refunded back to the company. <br />The board recommended moving forward with the changes in the energy portion and <br />the amendments going into effect for the IRC and IBC. <br />Adoption of 1997 Abatement of Dangerous Building Code <br />This adoption gives the City permission to claim a building is dangerous or unsafe and <br />is no longer allowed to be an occupied space. Root explains to the board the benefits of <br />adopting this code. <br />Revoking a Contractor's License <br />Root explains to the board that he has been working with the City Attorney in creating the <br />process and procedure of revoking a contractor license. The City Attorney is reviewing <br />staff's documents and will provide feedback on how to proceed with adopting the process. <br />Root explains that the process of revoking a license would begin with the chief building <br />official receiving the complaint. Then if the complaint held merit, the building official would <br />decide whether or not the board would need to be involved in revoking the license or not. <br />Staff Comments: <br />None heard. <br />Discussion Items for Next Meeting: <br />➢ Procedure of Revoking a Contractor License <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.