My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 01 22
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 01 22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:30 PM
Creation date
2/1/2019 10:28:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
8D6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2019 01 22
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
437
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 8, 2019 <br />Page 3 of 8 <br />COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS ON PERTINENT ITEMS NOT ON THE <br />AGENDA <br />Mayor Muckle wished everyone a Happy New Year. <br />CITY MANAGER'S REPORT <br />City Manager Balser wished everyone a Happy New Year and reminded everyone of <br />the Recreation/Senior Center Grand Opening on January 26t" <br />REGULAR BUSINESS <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION — HIGHWAY 42 AND SHORT STREET INTERSECTION <br />IMPROVEMENTS <br />Director Kowar stated this is an update on the Highway 42 project. The City is now <br />advertising for bids for improvements from Griffith Street to South Street. He stated staff <br />wants to make sure everyone is aware of the project, identify what the benefits and <br />tradeoffs of the project will be, confirm the improvements, and discuss the project's <br />long-term goals. <br />This project addresses current issues such as traffic and traffic signals; it does not <br />address longer term issues. The specific question is should a three -lane option be <br />considered or should we make changes that will allow a five -lane option in the future. <br />He reviewed the three -lane plans and also noted how traffic signal warrants are <br />affecting the conversation. He reviewed the schedule and noted the current cost <br />estimate for the project is about $500,000 over budget. <br />He reviewed the history of the corridor and the project updates over the last 25 years. <br />He discussed how different traffic signal options will affect the corridor. The 2013 plan <br />looked for ways to fit every use in the right-of-way and everyone decided it must stay at <br />three lanes. In 2018, we tried a variety of virtual scenarios and found options to prepare <br />the corridor for five lanes similar to South Boulder Road. <br />Staff is trying to plan for the future and address growing traffic numbers and the <br />possible addition of ball fields on the east side. He noted the forecasted travel times on <br />the corridor are going to be much longer than they are today. The five -lane option <br />addresses this the best. <br />He stated staff previously thought the secondary network of streets in DELO would take <br />pressure off of Hwy 42 but this was not built. He added CDOT doesn't recommend the <br />offset left pedestrian refuge islands; and the signal at Cannon does not seem feasible <br />any longer. <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.