Laserfiche WebLink
Discussion/Motion - Request to Change, Alter or Modify Premises or Addition of <br />Optional Premises <br /> The Lucre Company, Inc./dba Centennial Liquors <br /> Retail Liquor Store <br /> 324 McCaslin Blvd. To 368 McCaslin Blvd. <br /> <br />Morris called for any comments/discussion or motion. <br /> <br />m <br /> <br />Discussion on Authority Options Regarding Liquor Violations - Authority Attorney and <br />Authority Secretary <br /> <br />a. Video and Disposition of Union Jack Liquors Violation <br /> <br />The Attorney and Secretary to the Authority were directed to provide information regarding the Union <br />Jack Violation and provide the Authority with options regarding the violation. <br /> <br />Authority reviewed the video tape provided as evidence by the license holder to the Municipal Court. <br />The Authority reviewed copies of the summons and the courts motion for deferred prosecution. The <br />defendant is not to have any alcohol related offenses resulting in a conviction; add instructions to his <br />employee policy with respect to this incident; agrees to pay thirty dollars ($30.00) court cost. (See <br />attached documentation.) <br /> <br />Authority Attorney explained to the Authority that in any enforcement type of action related to a <br />violation of a liquor code or r6gulations it will follow the same options: <br /> <br />1) <br />2) <br /> <br />3) <br /> <br />4) <br /> <br />5) <br /> <br />6) <br /> <br />Investigate the allegations of the complaint. <br />Written investigative report containing factual information. These reports should relate to <br />specific provisions or violations of the liquor code or regulations, city ordinance <br />provisions or state statutes violated. <br />Review to determine if alleged violations are sufficient to warrant an administrative <br />hearing in the matter for suspension or revocation. <br />Authority has options to convene a hearing on the matter or taking no action if there was <br />essentially insufficient evidence to go forward to a formal hearing process. <br />If the Authority decides that it does not want to go through the formal administrative <br />hearing process, the Authority has two options: a) no action and simply file the report for <br />future reference in the file of the applicant or discard it and drop the matter; b) issue a <br />written warning (a letter of warning detailing what the violations were and advising the <br />licensee of the Board's concerns). The letter will state that it will become a part of the <br />licensee's file for future reference and that the Authority is placing them on notice. <br />If the Authority should decide that the reports warrant a hearing, it must decide what kind <br />of hearing is to be held. <br /> <br /> <br />