My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2019 01 29 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2019 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2019 01 29 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:58 PM
Creation date
2/20/2019 11:51:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2019 01 29 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 29, 2019 <br />Page 5of7 <br />Mayor Muckle stated Council may need to reaffirm what they want to see on the site; <br />perhaps it is a low priority <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton would like a discussion of it as the Comp Plan is not in alignment <br />with the market, perhaps we need a market study He would like to do it before we have a <br />proposal in front of us. We should drive the conversation He would like this a medium <br />priority <br />Councilmember Loo agreed the Council needs a better handle on the potential of the <br />property and the pitfalls before a proposal comes in <br />Members chose to leave it on the list as a medium priority, Q3-4 <br />Councilmember Maloney stated the Revitalization Commission update should be Q1-2 <br />Members agreed <br />Councilmember Leh would like polling in Q2, we need some information in a number of <br />policy areas. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated the Council does not have enough direction or <br />information to consider a tax question in 2019 so polling is not a priority <br />City Manager Balser stated the polling would be for information on policies for a 2020 <br />ballot question, not for 2019 It is a long process and staff would need Q2-3 to prepare for <br />a 2020 Q1 poll <br />Councilmember Leh stated he would like a poll on policy issues in general not polling <br />specifically for issues going on the ballot. This would give Council a good feel for the <br />pulse of the community on a variety of issues. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she feels the City needs to get better engagement on <br />individual topics not through polling <br />Members agreed to remove the item from the list. <br />Councilmember Maloney would like to have the 2020 Work Plan discussion start in Q4 so <br />it is ready early in 2020 Members decided to add it as a Q4 item <br />Councilmember Maloney would like the City Manager evaluation scheduled in 2020 Q1 <br />as well <br />Low priorities <br />• Senior Services Update <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.