My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2019 02 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2019 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2019 02 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:58 PM
Creation date
2/20/2019 11:52:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2019 02 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 5, 2019 <br />Page 8 of 21 <br />senior housing, downsizing housing, affordable housing Not much support for large <br />standalone apartment complexes. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked what is the role of housing in making this redevelopment <br />successful He asked how the number of units was determined for the overall success of <br />the redevelopment. Prosser stated there is no perfect answer how much is needed to <br />support the retail Dwelling units in the redevelopment drive the financial feasibility; adds <br />vitality to the area at times not currently being seen Residential creates demand at later <br />hours, throughout the day, on weekends, and diversifies the demand times. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked given the fact Superior and Broomfield are adding housing <br />units, how does this small number make this work. Prosser stated it is the integration with <br />other uses that makes it financially feasibility; it is a desired. use that supports other uses <br />and vitality Finding ways to diversify the users in the area can help make the site more <br />attractive to retailers <br />Mr Guimond added the residential use is at a minimal increment for a developer to get it <br />to operate at a reasonable level <br />Guimond summarized the alternatives and next steps. He felt the big boxes would have <br />been filled by now if it were not for the GDP and the covenants. He summarized the <br />Alternative Analysis: <br />O Private covenants are likely a barrier in all scenarios and need to be addressed <br />• Re -tenanting may be achievable but does not support community desire <br />O Partial re -development is the most market supportable and a fiscal performer if the <br />GDP and covenants are addressed but does not fully support community desires <br />O Major redevelopment meets the community desires but would occur over time <br />Recommended Implementation Steps. <br />O Modify the GDP and development agreement to allow for greater variety of uses, <br />multifamily housing and greater density on site as incentive for retail development <br />O Provide an additional density allowance and greater allowance for non -sales tax <br />generating uses within redevelopment projects that provide community amenities <br />or enhance connectivity <br />• Modify focus on supporting and growing retail base to include focus on community - <br />oriented uses <br />O Work with Parcel 0 property owners to modify the CCRs to allow for an expanded <br />mix of retail and non -retail uses <br />O Invest in public improvements and amenities that allow Parcel 0 to succeed in an <br />evolving commercial market <br />Public Comments <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.