My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 02 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 02 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:30 PM
Creation date
2/21/2019 2:03:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
9A1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2019 02 05
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 22, 2019 <br />Page 5 of 16 <br />not a sustainable or progressive strategy and does not encourage sustainability. It does <br />not feel like this is the right strategy. Speaking for her husband she stated he does not <br />support it as proposed and not in line with downtown character. People come downtown <br />for the way it feels, not the parking. Need better selection of downtown businesses for a <br />dynamic and interesting assortment. He urged don't lose the charm of downtown and <br />utilize the existing parking. <br />John Leary, 1116 LaFarge Avenue, stated downtown is not blighted and this does not <br />need to be addressed in downtown. During the past 10 years downtown has performed <br />well economically. He felt Council should reevaluate the blight determination of 2006. <br />Rick Kron, president of the Downtown Business Association (DBA), said the Association <br />Board has discussed these concepts and feel there is an emerging parking problem. As a <br />result the DBA supports further research development and potential implementation of <br />parking solutions that may include a parking garage in the future. The DBA feels it is <br />premature to take any option off the table. <br />Blair McBride, 940 Elm Street, felt this will take away from the charm of downtown. He <br />sees open parking spots on a regular basis. Only on special event nights are the extra <br />spaces needed. He felt there are plenty of parking spaces in DELO and just off of Main <br />Street. <br />Conor Seyle, 397 County Road, stated he opposes all the designs and does not see the <br />need for more parking as there is much underutilized parking. If this is for future growth <br />this is a bet and if it doesn't bring more development it will be a large empty building. He <br />felt long-term trends will show this is not needed. If it goes forward he urged Council to go <br />back to the drawing board and address new trends for conversion. <br />Brian Topping, 1550 White Violet Way, stated there are ways to combine density and <br />charm that would make the area a destination point. These concepts are under inspired, <br />they should have green space on top and they could be a way to bring people downtown. <br />He suggested finding a way to add to the culture and be forward looking. <br />Sherry Sommer, 910 S. Palisade Ct., stated this plan is not consistent with the Hwy 42 <br />Urban Renewal Plan and Market Feasibility Study. She noted the goals to use most <br />efficient use of resources, consistent with the goals and policies of the City and enhance <br />quality of life. She felt these goals are not met with the parking garage. She expressed <br />the need to put people first in urban planning <br />Karen Tucker, 601 1/2 Main, asked Council to think differently, it will be about alternative <br />transportation in the future; need to look at alternatives. Make it special, make it a retail <br />destination. This plan is going backwards; think forward. <br />Jean Morgan, 1131 Spruce Street, stated she wonders if Louisville is trying to compete <br />with Lafayette. We need to look at alternatives, underground parking, utilizing the sports <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.