My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2019 02 14
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2019 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2019 02 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:12 AM
Creation date
2/25/2019 3:28:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2019 02 14
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
273
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
McCaslin Corridor the study concludes that approximately 20% of the market demand <br />for new retail demand (30,000 sq. ft.) is likely to occur in the corridor. Other supportive <br />uses, such as office, residential and entertainment could help make retail viable within <br />any particular development. <br />Staff ran the City's fiscal impact model under three scenarios to better understand the <br />potential implications to City services as a result of changing the phasing. The first <br />scenario shows the full absorption (time to build and occupy the space) of both <br />commercial buildings in two years, which matches the fiscal analysis conducted when <br />the City originally approved the PUD and GDP amendment in 2016. The second <br />scenario reflects absorption of Building F between three and five years and Building E <br />between eight and 10 years, which represents a possible scenario allowing the <br />commercial phasing as proposed if both buildings end up being constructed. The third <br />scenario reflects absorption of Building F between three and five years with Building E <br />never being developed as a "worst case" scenario. With all scenarios, the commercial <br />development is modeled with 30% office space and 70% retail space. <br />Fiscal Model Inputs <br />Scenario 1 <br />I Scenario 2 <br />Scenario 3 <br />Residential Units <br />32 <br />_ 32 <br />32 <br />Market Value <br />$600,000 <br />_ $600,000 <br />$600,000 <br />Construction Value <br />$480,000 <br />$480,000 <br />$480,000 <br />Household Income <br />$90,000 <br />$90,000 <br />$90,000 <br />Absorption <br />years 2-5 <br />years 2-5 <br />years 2-5 <br />Commercial Building E <br />Market Value/Sq. Ft. <br />$250 <br />$250 <br />$250 <br />Construction Value/Sq. Ft. <br />$175 <br />$175 <br />$175 <br />Retail Sales/Sq. Ft. <br />$200 <br />$200 <br />$200 <br />Absorption <br />year 2 <br />years 8-10 <br />no development <br />Commercial Building F <br />Market Value <br />$250 <br />$250 <br />$250 <br />Construction Value <br />$175 <br />$175 <br />$175 <br />Retail Sales/Sq. Ft. <br />$200 <br />$200 <br />$200 <br />Absorption <br />year 2 <br />years 3-5 <br />years 3-5 <br />The fiscal model table on the following page provides the 20-year totals (per $1,000) for <br />revenue, expenditures and net fiscal impact. The model shows that all scenarios <br />provide a net positive fiscal impact. Scenario 1 estimates a 20-year positive fiscal <br />impact of $2.2 million or an average of $111,200 per year. Scenario 2 estimates a 20- <br />year positive fiscal impact of $1.8 million or an average of $91,300 per year. Scenario 3 <br />estimates a 20-year positive fiscal impact of $954,000 or an average of $47,000 per <br />year <br />Planning Commission <br />February 14, 2019 — Foundry Phasing Amendment <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.