My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 03 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 03 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:30 PM
Creation date
3/1/2019 2:04:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
9A1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2019 03 05
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1258
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 19, 2019 <br />Page 4 of 9 <br />3. In no case, shall the certificate of occupancy for the last of the residential 8-plex <br />buildings be issued unless: The last certificatc of occupancy for one of the <br />residential 8 plex buildings shall be withheld until: 1) start of construction of the first <br />commercial building commences, as defined by the 2018 International Building <br />Code, which includes the first placement of permanent construction of a building, <br />such as pouring of a slab or footings, installation of pilings or construction of <br />columns; and 2) 30% of the net leasable space has identified tenants with proof <br />being as an executed Letter of Intent coupled with a security deposit. <br />Staff recommends approval with either the originally proposed staff conditions or the <br />proposed Planning Commission conditions. <br />Councilmember Maloney asked how the retail sales per square foot number was <br />calculated. Director Zuccaro stated the number was consistent with the 2016 model when <br />it was originally approved; it is likely a conservative number based on recent information. <br />Applicant presentation <br />Justin McClure, 1002 Griffith Street, stated nothing substantive has changed from 2016. <br />He stated it was always the company's intent to build the Foundry building concurrently <br />with the condominiums but he feels the approval resolution lacked clarity. <br />Councilmember Maloney asked what was not clear in the resolution. McClure stated the <br />resolution can be interpreted that both buildings should be built concurrently but that was <br />not the intent in the conversations he had with staff at that time. He added the retail <br />market on Highway 42 has proven to be somewhat soft. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked what percentage of DELO commercial is tenanted. <br />McClure stated DELO Station is almost 65% tenanted. He stated they are using <br />incentives to get office space filled. He stated signalization at Short Street and Hwy 42 <br />would help to get DELO plaza built out. <br />Public Comments <br />Gary Larson, 2189 Park Lane, stated he lives adjacent to the proposed development. In <br />2015 and 2016 a coalition of the homes in the Highway 42 are had great support for this <br />project. He stated he would like to see the Foundry Building developed as it would be an <br />upscale addition to the community. He supports the request. <br />John Leary, 1116 LaFarge, stated he does not agree with the methodology for the fiscal <br />review. He stated the fiscal analysis at the time of approval was within the margin of <br />breaking even. By using the lower square footage number he feels the current analysis is <br />concealing a negative fiscal impact that does not meet the Comp Plan requirement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.