My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2019 02 12 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2019 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2019 02 12 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:58 PM
Creation date
3/6/2019 10:13:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2019 02 12 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 12, 2019 <br />Page 11 of 12 <br />spreading out the use across any newly developed fields, or within the existing <br />City -owned fields at the Sports Complex. <br />• There would be no additional cost (beyond inflationary costs) for the City to utilize, <br />maintain or manage the fields. The City would not be charged rent for the use of its <br />own fields. <br />• Consistent with current practice, the City would generate revenue from the non- <br />public use of its publicly owned facilities. <br />• Consistent with current policy/practice, assure maintaining program pricing that <br />supports equity in recreational opportunities for broad socio-economic group <br />participation <br />• Consistent with current policy/practice, assure program offerings that encourage all <br />ages and abilities have access to Louisville fields, such as maintaining learn -to and <br />non -tryout based teams. <br />• The City of Louisville would continue to brand, administer and operate its programs <br />and recreational sports. <br />• A traffic study should be completed to determine impacts on State Highway 42, <br />and a plan for addressing impacts would need to be developed <br />• Honor the current IGA adopted by the existing communities. <br />• Balance the need for local access to fields with the desire to attract tournaments <br />drawing visitors to the community <br />Mayor Muckle asked if the City's use of their portion is at the full 24 acres. Deputy City <br />Manager Davis said that could be verified <br />Public Comments — None <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated this is difficult as it is an unsolicited proposal and it is a <br />timing issue. We have always heard people want more playfields, but it is not a high <br />priority for the community Would like to know what our unmet need is and what our <br />options are, there may be other ways of doing it we need to consider We have an aging <br />population and a stable population so he's not sure if we have an unmet need and if it <br />would grow <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton felt there is an inherent problem to this public/private partnership if <br />we give up control and live with that for the life of the contract. He is not sure we want to <br />do that. This is not a critical service, but may fall under the category of we want to retain <br />control and do it ourselves. He noted when we privatized the golf course it did not go well <br />and most of those issues would be the same here. This may not get us to where we want <br />to be on playfields. We need a better needs assessment before going too far down this <br />path <br />Councilmember Leh stated the lack of soccer fields in town has always been maddening <br />The community has needed a place to play soccer He thinks the need is fairly clear, but it <br />needs to be studied He is intrigued by the idea of working with a private entity Some <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.