My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Legal Review Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 03 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
LEGAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Legal Review Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Legal Review Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Legal Review Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 03 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:20:39 PM
Creation date
3/18/2019 10:20:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
LCPKT 2019 03 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Attorney Biennial Evaluation <br />1. Members of the City Council will each complete an evaluation form. Evaluation <br />forms will be anonymous and kept confidential through the process, however the <br />final rating is public record. <br />Possible questions. <br />1. Does the City Council feel it is getting value for its legal fees? <br />2. Does the City Attorney provide honest recommendations given all legal <br />issues and ramifications? <br />3. Does the City Attorney possess an efficient and effective knowledge of the <br />Municipal Code and City Charter? <br />4. Does the City Attorney possess an efficient and effective knowledge of <br />government regulations and case law regarding issues facing the City? <br />5. Does the City Attorney proactively identify potential issues to avoid future <br />problems? <br />6. Is the City Attorney's approach effective in achieving the best possible <br />legal outcomes for the City? <br />7. Does the City Attorney represent the City in a professional and ethical <br />manner? <br />8. Is the City Attorney impartial and objective in her duties and <br />responsibilities? <br />9. Does the City Attorney communicate effectively with the City Council and <br />staff? <br />10.Are the City Attorney's communications complete and understandable, <br />and do they answer Council's questions? <br />11 Does the City Attorney maintain effective and open communications with <br />the City Council? <br />12.Comments: Is there anything else you would like to share: <br />11. Staff will complete an evaluation form. This will include the City Manager, all <br />department directors, and a sampling of others who work closely with the City <br />Attorney's Office. Evaluation forms will be anonymous and kept confidential <br />through the process, however the final rating is public record. <br />Possible questions. Questions refer to all staff of Kelly, PC, not only Kathleen <br />Kelly. <br />1. Does the City Attorney prepare ordinances, resolutions, and contracts <br />accurately and consistent with the direction from City Council, City <br />Manager, directors? <br />2. Does the City Attorney maintain good working relationships with staff? <br />3. Are regular legal activities achieved within a sufficient timeframe? <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.